Cited by 117Workplace Health and Well-beingCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Impact of Worksite Wellness Intervention on Cardiac Risk Factors and One-Year Health Care Costs

Milani, Richard V., Lavie, Carl J.·2009·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training (CRET) provides health risk intervention in cardiac patients over a relatively short time frame. Worksite health programs offer a unique opportunity for health intervention, but these programs remain underused due to concerns over recouping the costs. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month worksite health intervention using staff from CRET. Employees (n = 308) and spouses (n = 31) of a single employer were randomized to active intervention (n = 185) consisting of worksite health education, nutritional counseling, smoking cessation counseling, physical activity promotion, selected physician referral, and other health counseling versus usual care (n = 154). Health risk status was assessed at baseline and after the 6-month intervention program, and total medical claim costs were obtained in all participants during the year before and the year after intervention. Significant improvements were demonstrated in quality-of-life scores (+10%, p = 0.001), behavioral symptoms (depression -33%, anxiety -32%, somatization -33%, and hostility -47%, all p values <0.001), body fat (-9%, p = 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+13%, p = 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (-2%, p = 0.01), health habits (-60%, p = 0.0001), and total health risk (-25%, p = 0.0001). Of employees categorized as high risk at baseline, 57% were converted to low-risk status. Average employee annual claim costs decreased 48% (p = 0.002) for the 12 months after the intervention, whereas control employees' costs remained unchanged (-16%, p = NS), thus creating a sixfold return on investment. In conclusion, worksite health intervention using CRET staff decreased total health risk and markedly decreased medical claim costs within 12 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 117

Authors
Milani, R. V., & Lavie, C. J.
Affiliations
Ochsner Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Milani, Richard V.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
1389-1392
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002357621
Cited by
117
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
cardiac rehabilitation, cost-effectiveness, health care costs, cardiovascular risk factors, health education, nutrition counseling, smoking cessation counseling, physical activity promotion, quality of life, anxiety and depression, fat mass, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, employer-sponsored health programs, return on investment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Blood Pressure, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Counseling, Depression, Diastole, Diet, Female, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Health Education, Health Promotion, Health Status, Hostility, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Cholesterol, HDL, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Health Services, Quality of Life, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Smoking Cessation, Health Care Costs, Risk Assessment, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review