Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normal Limits in Relation to Age, Body Size and Gender of Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Aortic Root Dimensions in Persons ≥15 Years of Age

Open access
Devereux, Richard B., de Simone, Giovanni, Arnett, Donna K., Best, Lyle G., Boerwinkle, Eric, Howard, Barbara V., Kitzman, Dalane, Lee, Elisa T., Mosley, Thomas H., Weder, Alan, Roman, Mary J.·2012·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Nomograms to predict normal aortic root diameter for body surface area (BSA) in broad ranges of age have been widely used, but are limited by lack of consideration of gender effects, jumps in upper limits of aortic diameter between age strata, and data from older teenagers. Sinuses of Valsalva diameter was measured by American Society of Echocardiography convention in normal-weight, non-hypertensive, non-diabetic individuals ≥15 years old without aortic valve disease from clinical or population-based samples. Analyses of covariance and linear regression with assessment of residuals identified determinants and developed predictive models for normal aortic root diameter. Among 1,207 apparently normal individuals ≥15 years old (54% female), aortic root diameter was 2.1 to 4.3 cm. Aortic root diameter was strongly related to BSA and height (both r=0.48), age (r=0.36) and male gender (+2.7 mm adjusted for BSA and age) (all p<0.001). Multivariable equations using age, gender, and either BSA or height predicted aortic diameter strongly (both R=0.674, p <0.001) with minimal relation of residuals to age or body size: for BSA: 2.423+(age [yrs]*0.009) + (bsa [m2]*0.461) -(sex [1=M, 2=F]*.267) SEE = 0.261 cm for height: 1.519+(age [yrs]*0.010) + (ht [cm]*.010)-(sex [1=M, 2=F]*.247) SEE = 0.215 cm. In conclusion, aortic root diameter is larger in men and increases with body size and age. Regression models incorporating body size, age and gender are applicable to adolescents and adults without limitations of previous nomograms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.063

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Devereux, R. B., de Simone, G., Arnett, D. K., Best, L. G., Boerwinkle, E., Howard, B. V., Kitzman, D., Lee, E. T., Mosley, T. H., Weder, A., & Roman, M. J.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
110
Issue
8
Pages
1189-1194
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970839201
Cited by
394
References
2
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normal Limits in Relation to Age, Body Size and Gender of Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Aortic Root Dimensions in Persons ≥15 Years of Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.063
The paper
Devereux, R. B., de Simone, G., Arnett, D. K., Best, L. G., Boerwinkle, E., Howard, B. V., Kitzman, D., Lee, E. T., Mosley, T. H., Weder, A., & Roman, M. J. (2012). Normal Limits in Relation to Age, Body Size and Gender of Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Aortic Root Dimensions in Persons ≥15 Years of Age. The American Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.063

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.