Cited by 17Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk assessment in primary hypertension: should threshold levels be revised?

RATTO, E, LEONCINI, G, VIAZZI, F, VACCARO, V, PARODI, A, FALQUI, V, BEZANTE, G, TOMOLILLO, C +2 more·2006·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary albumin excretion and left ventricular mass are related to each other and to the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with primary hypertension. We aimed to identify a lower threshold for albuminuria that might improve detection of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and cost-effectiveness in cardiovascular risk assessment. METHODS: Albuminuria and left ventricular mass index were assessed in 448 untreated, nondiabetic patients with primary hypertension. The impact that lower albuminuria cut-off levels might have on detecting LVH was evaluated with regard to test cost and sensitivity. This was done by a diagnostic algorithm consisting of albuminuria evaluation followed by echocardiography in the presence of normoalbuminuria. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve of albuminuria in predicting LVH was 0.73. Using a lower albumin to creatinine ratio threshold than what is recommended by the guidelines (ie, 11.5 mg/g), the sensitivity and specificity of albuminuria in identifying patients with LVH was 39% and 92%, respectively, which translated to positive and negative predictive values of 76% and 69%, respectively. When considering only patients without electrocardiographically detected LVH, routine screening for albuminuria, followed by echocardiography in the presence of albuminuria

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.12.018

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RATTO, E., LEONCINI, G., VIAZZI, F., VACCARO, V, PARODI, A., FALQUI, V, BEZANTE, G., TOMOLILLO, C., DEFERRARI, G., & PONTREMOLI, R.
Affiliations
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
Corresponding author
PONTREMOLI, R
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2006-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
728-734
ISSN
0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089379699
Cited by
17
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
microalbuminuria, essential hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, albumin-creatinine ratio, diagnostic thresholds, cardiovascular risk assessment, echocardiography, cost-effectiveness of screening, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Albuminuria, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular System, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review