Cited by 414Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

Exercise training for patients with heart failure: a systematic review of factors that improve mortality and morbidity

Smart, Neil, Marwick, Thomas H·2004·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To determine the efficacy of exercise training and its effects on outcomes in patients with heart failure.Methods MEDLINE, Medscape, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry were searched for trials of exercise training in heart failure patients. Data relating to training protocol, exercise capacity, and outcome measures were extracted and reviewed.Results A total of 81 studies were identified: 30 randomized controlled trials, five nonrandomized controlled trials, nine randomized crossover trials, and 37 longitudinal cohort studies. Exercise training was performed in 2387 patients. The average increment in peak oxygen consumption was 17% in 57 studies that measured oxygen consumption directly, 17% in 40 studies of aerobic training, 9% in three studies that only used strength training, 15% in 13 studies of combined aerobic and strength training, and 16% in the one study on inspiratory training. There were no reports of deaths that were directly related to exercise during more than 60,000 patient-hours of exercise training. During the training and follow-up periods of the randomized controlled trials, there were 56 combined (deaths or adverse events) events in the exercise groups and 75 combined events in the control groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.32; P = 0.60). During this same period, 26 exercising and 41 nonexercising subjects died (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.02; P = 0.06).Conclusion Exercise training is safe and effective in patients with heart failure. The risk of adverse events may be reduced, but further studies are required to determine whether there is any mortality benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.033

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smart, N., & Marwick, T. H.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Marwick, Thomas H
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
116
Issue
10
Pages
693-706
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012240715
Cited by
414
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 37
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
heart failure, exercise training, aerobic exercise, resistance training, inspiratory muscle training, peak oxygen uptake, exercise capacity, mortality, morbidity, adverse events, exercise safety
MeSH terms
Heart Failure, Humans, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Risk, Safety, Exercise, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review