Cited by 90Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesSodium Intake and Health

Antihypertensive Efficacy of Hydrochlorothiazide vs Chlorthalidone Combined with Azilsartan Medoxomil

Bakris, George L., Sica, Domenic, White, William B., Cushman, William C., Weber, Michael A., Handley, Alison, Song, Eric, Kupfer, Stuart·2012·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Chlorthalidone has proven efficacy to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet it is infrequently used in practice. This study provides a direct comparison of chlorthalidone with hydrochlorothiazide, each combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil, on blood pressure reduction and control rates.Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, titrate-to-target blood pressure trial comparing the single-pill combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone versus co-administration of azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in participants with stage 2 primary hypertension. After 2 weeks of treatment with azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg alone, all participants also received 12.5 mg of diuretic for 4 weeks (up to week 6) and were titrated to 25 mg for another 4 weeks (up to week 10) if they failed to achieve target blood pressure. The primary end point was change in clinic systolic blood pressure. Target blood pressure was defined as clinic blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or chronic kidney disease or <130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or chronic kidney disease.Results The mean age of the 609 participants was 56.4 years, and the mean baseline clinic blood pressure was 164.6/95.4 mm Hg. The primary end point analysis at week 6 demonstrated a greater reduction of clinic systolic blood pressure for the chlorthalidone (-35.1 mm Hg) versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (-29.5 mm Hg) (mean difference, -5.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -8.3 to -2.9; P <.001). The mean difference in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at week 6 was -5.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -8.4 to -3.2; P <.001), favoring the azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone group. The percentage of participants achieving target clinic blood pressure at week 6 was greater for the chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (64.1% vs 45.9%, P <.001). Drug discontinuations due to adverse events were not statistically significantly different between groups (9.3% vs 7.3%, P = .38), and hypokalemia was uncommon in both groups.Conclusions Chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil provides better blood pressure reduction and a higher likelihood of achieving blood pressure control than hydrochlorothiazide combined with azilsartan medoxomil. This benefit occurred without a difference in safety measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakris, G. L., Sica, D., White, W. B., Cushman, W. C., Weber, M. A., Handley, A., Song, E., & Kupfer, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bakris, George L.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
125
Issue
12
Pages
1229.e1-1229.e10
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052409620
Cited by
90
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, azilsartan medoxomil, combination antihypertensive therapy, stage 2 hypertension, blood pressure control, diuretics, angiotensin receptor blockers, single-pill combination, ambulatory blood pressure, systolic blood pressure reduction
MeSH terms
Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Benzimidazoles, Chlorthalidone, Creatinine, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hydrochlorothiazide, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Oxadiazoles, Potassium, Systole, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review