Antihypertensive Efficacy of Hydrochlorothiazide vs Chlorthalidone Combined with Azilsartan Medoxomil
Abstract
Background Chlorthalidone has proven efficacy to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet it is infrequently used in practice. This study provides a direct comparison of chlorthalidone with hydrochlorothiazide, each combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil, on blood pressure reduction and control rates.Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, titrate-to-target blood pressure trial comparing the single-pill combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone versus co-administration of azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in participants with stage 2 primary hypertension. After 2 weeks of treatment with azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg alone, all participants also received 12.5 mg of diuretic for 4 weeks (up to week 6) and were titrated to 25 mg for another 4 weeks (up to week 10) if they failed to achieve target blood pressure. The primary end point was change in clinic systolic blood pressure. Target blood pressure was defined as clinic blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or chronic kidney disease or <130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or chronic kidney disease.Results The mean age of the 609 participants was 56.4 years, and the mean baseline clinic blood pressure was 164.6/95.4 mm Hg. The primary end point analysis at week 6 demonstrated a greater reduction of clinic systolic blood pressure for the chlorthalidone (-35.1 mm Hg) versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (-29.5 mm Hg) (mean difference, -5.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -8.3 to -2.9; P <.001). The mean difference in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at week 6 was -5.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -8.4 to -3.2; P <.001), favoring the azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone group. The percentage of participants achieving target clinic blood pressure at week 6 was greater for the chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (64.1% vs 45.9%, P <.001). Drug discontinuations due to adverse events were not statistically significantly different between groups (9.3% vs 7.3%, P = .38), and hypokalemia was uncommon in both groups.Conclusions Chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil provides better blood pressure reduction and a higher likelihood of achieving blood pressure control than hydrochlorothiazide combined with azilsartan medoxomil. This benefit occurred without a difference in safety measurements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparative studies show an additional SBP reduction of 7 to 8 mm Hg simply by switching from hydrochlorothiazide to the same daily dose of chlorthalidone.
“Comparative studies show an additional SBP reduction of 7 to 8 mm Hg simply by switching from hydrochlorothiazide to the same daily dose of chlorthalidone.370–372”
From Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2018) · cites this paper as [372]
Cites
Chobanian, A. V., Bakris, G. L., Black, H. R., Cushman, W. C., Green, L. A., Izzo, J. L., Jones, D. W., Materson, B. J., Oparil, S., Wright, J. T., et al. (2003) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000107251.49515.c2 · Cited by 13,271 · see citing works
Self-citationBrenner, B. M., Cooper, M. E., de Zeeuw, D., Keane, W. F., Mitch, W. E., Parving, H.-H., Remuzzi, G., Snapinn, S. M., Zhang, Z., & Shahinfar, S. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011161 · Cited by 7,493 · see citing works
Lewis, E. J., Hunsicker, L. G., Clarke, W. R., Berl, T., Pohl, M. A., Lewis, J. B., Ritz, E., Atkins, R. C., Rohde, R., & Raz, I. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011303 · Cited by 5,987 · see citing works
Law, M. R., Morris, J. K., & Wald, N. J. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1665 · Cited by 2,775 · see citing works
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008
Egan, B. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.650 · Cited by 2,197 · see citing works
Mancia, G., Laurent, S., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Burnier, M., Caulfield, M. J., Cifkova, R., Clément, D., Coca, A., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328333146d · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
(2004) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.003 · Cited by 1,235 · see citing works
Bakris, G. L., & Weir, M. R. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.5.685 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Self-citationManagement of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance
Krause, T., Lovibond, K., Caulfield, M., McCormack, T., & Williams, B. (2011) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4891 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Ernst, M. E., Carter, B. L., Goerdt, C. J., Steffensmeier, J. J. G., Phillips, B. B., Zimmerman, M. B., & Bergus, G. R. (2006) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000203309.07140.d3 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Wright, J. T. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.13.1595 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Diuretic Therapy for Hypertension and the Risk of Primary Cardiac Arrest
Siscovick, D. S., Raghunathan, T. E., Psaty, B. M., Koepsell, T. D., Wicklund, K. G., Lin, X., Cobb, L. A., Rautaharju, P. M., Copass, M. K., & Wagner, E. H. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406303302603 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Rahman, M. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.8.936 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Renal Dysfunction Complicating the Treatment of Hypertension
Palmer, B. F. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020676 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Chlorthalidone
Carter, B. L., Ernst, M. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000103632.19915.0e · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Elliott, W. J. (2006) · Yearbook of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0145-4145(07)70034-5 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Combination Therapy in Hypertension
Neutel, J. M. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-1-908517-28-9 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Staessen, J. A., Li, Y., Thijs, L., & Wang, J. (2005) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1291/hypres.28.385 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
White, W. B., Weber, M. A., Sica, D., Bakris, G. L., Perez, A., Cao, C., & Kupfer, S. (2011) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.163402 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Self-citationCombination therapy in hypertension
Gradman, A. H., Basile, J., Carter, B. L., & Bakris, G. L. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.jash.2010.03.001 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationBakris, G. L., Sica, D., Weber, M., White, W. B., Roberts, A., Perez, A., Cao, C., & Kupfer, S. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationSica, D. A., White, W. B., Weber, M. A., Bakris, G. L., Pérez, A., Cao, C., Handley, A., & Kupfer, S. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00482.x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationErnst, M. E., Neaton, J. D., Grimm, R. H., et al. (2011) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.181248 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Kjeldsen, S. E., Jamerson, K., Bakris, G. L., Pitt, B., Dahlöf, B., Velazquez, E. J., Hua, T. A., Kelly, R. Y., Zappe, D., Hester, A., et al. (2011) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.3109/08037051.2011.598699 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carey, R. M., Calhoun, D. A., Bakris, G. L., Brook, R. D., Daugherty, S. L., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C. R., Egan, B. M., Flack, J. M., Gidding, S. S., Judd, E., et al. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000084 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bakris, G. L., Sica, D., White, W. B., Cushman, W. C., Weber, M. A., Handley, A., Song, E., & Kupfer, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
- Takeda (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bakris, George L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1229.e1-1229.e10
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052409620
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, azilsartan medoxomil, combination antihypertensive therapy, stage 2 hypertension, blood pressure control, diuretics, angiotensin receptor blockers, single-pill combination, ambulatory blood pressure, systolic blood pressure reduction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Benzimidazoles, Chlorthalidone, Creatinine, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hydrochlorothiazide, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Oxadiazoles, Potassium, Systole, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review