Cited by 4Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No, Mindfulness Meditation-Based Analgesia Is Not Mediated by Endogenous Opioids

Open access
Zeidan, Fadel·2016·The American Journal of Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.027

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors did not directly statistically compare the differences in pain between the saline and naloxone conditions.

    “Importantly, the authors did not directly statistically compare the differences in pain between the saline and naloxone conditions, which begs the question on why they used the elegant crossover-controlled design.”
  • The authors' interpretations that mindfulness-based pain relief was reversed by naloxone were not justified because of the significant decrease in pain (↓19%) during mindfulness and naloxone infusion and comparable reductions during meditation and saline infusion (↓25%).

    “In our rebutting commentary of this study, we postulated that the authors' interpretations were not justified because of the significant decrease in pain (ie, ↓19%) during mindfulness and naloxone infusion and the comparable reductions during meditation and saline infusion (ie, ↓25%).133”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zeidan, F.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Zeidan, Fadel
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
129
Issue
11
Pages
e297
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531952913
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001420)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (L30 AT006838, K99AT008238)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, analgesia, endogenous opioids, naloxone, opioid antagonists, experienced meditators, analgesic mechanism, placebo effect
MeSH terms
Analgesia, Analgesics, Opioid, Humans, Meditation, Pain Management, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review