Cited by 35Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMedication Adherence and ComplianceAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Testing After an Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Event with Subsequent Statin Adherence and Intensification

Open access
Rana, Jamal S., Virani, Salim S., Moffet, Howard H., Liu, Jennifer Y., Coghlan, Landis A., Vasadia, Jitesh, Ballantyne, Christie M., Karter, Andrew J.·2022·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate associations between outpatient low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) testing and subsequent statin adherence and intensification in patients after an atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) event. Methods This was a longitudinal study of adult members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitalized with an ASCVD event (myocardial infarction or stroke) during January 01, 2016, to December 31, 2017, with follow-up through December 31, 2019. Outcomes were statin adherence (estimated using continuous medication gap [CMG]) and intensification (defined by an increased dose or switch to a higher-intensity statin) based on pharmacy dispensing. The exposure of interest was first outpatient LDL-C test after an ASCVD event. Baseline for follow-up was LDL-C test date or a date assigned using incidence density sampling. Multivariate logistic regression models were specified to estimate the odds ratios for statin adherence or intensification among those with vs without an LDL-C test, with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Results There were 19,604 adults hospitalized with ASCVD, including 7054 adults not on high-intensity statins. The mean age was 69.5 years and 33.0% were female. Prevalence of good adherence (continuous medication gap ≤20%) was significantly higher (80.2% vs 75.9%; odds ratio 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.49; P <.001) among participants who had an LDL-C test compared with participants who did not. LDL-C testing was associated with significantly higher rates of treatment intensification (16.1% vs 10.7%; odds ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval,1.29-1.76; P <0.001). Conclusions Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol testing is recommended for patients with a history of ASCVD and may be a high-value and low-cost intervention to improve adherence and statin management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.11.011

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monitoring lipid profiles after initiation of statin therapy and during therapy increases the likelihood of dose titration and following the statin treatment plan.

    “Monitoring lipid profiles after initiation of statin therapy and during therapy increases the likelihood of dose titration and following the statin treatment plan (94)(95)(96).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Results report that LDL-C testing after an ASCVD event was associated with higher statin adherence and treatment intensification. However, the claim generalizes this finding to lipid-profile monitoring during statin therapy more broadly and implies that monitoring increases these outcomes. The Discussion states that the observational design cannot establish a causal relationship. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Monitoring lipid profiles after initiation of statin therapy and during therapy increases the likelihood of dose titration and following the statin treatment plan.

    “Monitoring lipid profiles after initiation of statin therapy and during therapy increases the likelihood of dose titration and following the statin treatment plan (88–90).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Results report that LDL-C testing after an ASCVD event was associated with higher statin adherence and treatment intensification. But the Discussion says the observational design cannot establish causation, and the study does not establish this effect for statin users generally after initiation or throughout therapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rana, J. S., Virani, S. S., Moffet, H. H., Liu, J. Y., Coghlan, L. A., Vasadia, J., Ballantyne, C. M., & Karter, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Santa Rosa Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rana, Jamal S.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
135
Issue
5
Pages
603-606
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217074882
Cited by
35
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
LDL cholesterol testing, statin adherence, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, secondary prevention, high-intensity statins, medication management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Stroke, Atherosclerosis, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review