Cited by 4Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Five-year glycemic trajectories among healthy African-American and European-American offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Razavi, Laleh N, Ebenibo, Sotonte, Edeoga, Chimaroke, Wan, Jim, Dagogo-Jack, Samuel·2020·The American Journal of the Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background Cross-sectional surveys report a higher prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in African Americans (AA) than European Americans (EA). We studied 5-year glycemic excursions among AA and EA in the Pathobiology of Prediabetes in A Biracial Cohort study, to assess ethnic disparities.Materials and methods Pathobiology of Prediabetes in A Biracial Cohort followed normoglycemic offspring of parents with T2DM for 5 years, with serial assessments of oral glucose tolerance test , anthropometry, body fat, insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. The primary outcome was progression to prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance). We further analyzed 5-year changes in fasting (FPG) and 2-hour plasma glucose (2hrPG).Results One hundred and one (52 AA, 49 EA) out of 343 subjects developed prediabetes during follow-up. The change in FPG ranged from -24 mg/dl to +38 mg/dl. The FPG remained stable (± 5 mg/dl from baseline) in 50% of EA and 46.8% of AA and the 2hrPG remained stable (± 25 mg/dl from baseline) in 73.7% of EA and 71.0 % of AA during follow-up. The proportions with change in FPG of 5mg/dl to >25 mg/dl and 2hrPG of 25 mg/dl to >50 mg/dl were similar in EA and AA offspring, as were the 10th - 90th percentiles of the distribution of 5-year changes in FPG and 2hrPG.Conclusions During 5 years of follow-up, black and white offspring of parents with T2DM exhibited remarkable phenotypic concordance of glycemic trajectories. Thus, parental history of T2DM may be a stronger factor than race/ethnicity in the prediction of longitudinal glycemic trends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.005

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CDC reports a higher prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and other non-European-origin persons than in European Americans.

    “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported a higher prevalence of diagnosed DM in African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and other persons of non-European origin compared with European Americans.36,37”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says reports found higher diagnosed type 2 diabetes prevalence in African Americans and other racial/ethnic groups than in European Americans, and cites CDC estimates comparing non-Hispanic Black and white adults. It does not specifically say that the CDC reported higher diagnosed-diabetes prevalence in Hispanic Americans or every other non-European-origin group; the quoted CDC figures also combine diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2019, Standards of care in diabetes —2019, Diabetes Care, 42, S13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Razavi, L. N., Ebenibo, S., Edeoga, C., Wan, J., & Dagogo-Jack, S.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dagogo-Jack, Samuel
Venue
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
359
Issue
5
Pages
266-270
ISSN
0002-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010663769
Cited by
4
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of the Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • National Institutes of Health (7-07-MN-13)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, ethnic disparities, fasting blood glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Black or African American, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family Health, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Phenotype, Prediabetic State, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Glucose Intolerance, White People, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review