Cited by 32Diversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and DiversityMentoring and Academic Development

Hospital-based, Multidisciplinary, youth mentoring and medical exposure program positively influences and reinforces health care career choice: “The Reach One Each One Program early Experience”

Danner, Omar K., Lokko, Carl, Mobley, Felicia, Dansby, Montreka, Maze, Michael, Bradley, Brene’, Williams, Elizabeth, Matthews, Leslie Ray +7 more·2017·The American Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background According to the National Center for Educational Statistics, underrepresented minorities (URMs) are more likely to leave science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields at higher rates than their peers during undergraduate studies. Many institutions of higher learning have implemented pipeline programs aimed at preparing and inspiring high school and college aged students in select careers in health sciences with varying levels of success. Research has shown that a health care workforce that mirrors the community they serve is more effective in reducing health disparities and increasing positive health outcomes. We hypothesize that a hospital-based, multidisciplinary youth mentoring and medical exposure program will enhance the decision of URM high school students to choose healthcare careers. Materials and method A retrospective analysis of the Reach One Each One Program (ROEO) was performed. ROEO is a hospital based, 11-week multidisciplinary youth mentoring and medical exposure program for inner-city high school students. The analysis was based on a phone survey of the twenty-six (26) seniors who completed the program and subsequently graduated from high school between May 2013 and May 2015 to assess the following: 1) College enrollment/attendance, 2) Health profession majors, and 3) Pre-med status. The study was approved by the Morehouse School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Results Of the twenty-six students, 23 were female and 3 were m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danner, O. K., Lokko, C., Mobley, F., Dansby, M., Maze, M., Bradley, B., Williams, E., Matthews, L. R., Harrington, E., Mack, L., Clark, C., Wilson, K., Beech, D., Heron, S., & Childs, E.
Affiliations
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Atlanta Public Schools (US)
  • Grady Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Shepherd Center (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Danner, Omar K.
Venue
The American Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
213
Issue
4
Pages
611-616
ISSN
0002-9610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562965670
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fulton DeKalb Hospital Authority, Atlanta, GA
  • The Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH
  • The Dean's Office at the Morehouse School of Medicine
  • Environmental Law Group, Birmingham, AL
  • Fennell Medical, LLC, Hueytown, AL
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
Keywords
youth mentoring programs, underrepresented minorities, medical radiation exposure, premedical education, hospital programs, inner-city students, health disparities
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adolescent, Career Choice, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Retrospective Studies, Students, Health Occupations, United States, Urban Population, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review