Cited by 7Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchMental Health via Writing

Le développement du discours des personnes blessées psychiques: de l’indicible à la métaphore

Open access
Gayraud, Frédérique, Auxéméry, Yann·2023·Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amp.2021.12.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gayraud, F., & Auxéméry, Y.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Interdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est (FR)
Corresponding author
Auxéméry, Yann
Venue
Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
181
Issue
3
Pages
216-226
ISSN
0003-4487 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319164482
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma narratives, trauma discourse, repetition, incomplete utterances, pauses, periphrasis, metaphor, Bataclan attack, military veterans, Afghanistan War, adaptation strategies, English discourse, cross-linguistic comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review