Cited by 14Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchMental Health via Writing

Identification des marques du traumatisme psychique dans le langage parlé : définition de l’échelle diagnostique « SPLIT-10 »

Open access
Auxéméry, Yann, Gayraud, Frédérique·2021·Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amp.2021.08.015

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auxéméry, Y., & Gayraud, F.
Affiliations
  • Interdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Auxéméry, Yann
Venue
Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
179
Issue
10
Pages
869-888
ISSN
0003-4487 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200116371
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
psychological trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, spoken language analysis, trauma diagnosis, dissociation, digital phenotyping, trauma narratives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review