Prebiotic effects of neoagaro-oligosaccharides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose
Abstract
To investigate the prebiotic properties of neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOS), obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose, the in vitro and in vivo effects of NAOS on bacterial growth were studied. In vitro NAOS were found to be highly resistant to enzymes of the upper gastrointestinal tract, which remained intact after 24h incubation with different amylolytic enzymes. NAOS significantly stimulated the growth of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in Man-Rogosa-Sharp (MRS) medium, anaerobically. Compared with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), 1% (w/v) NAOS promoted the specific growth rate of beneficial bacteria by about 100%. The decreases of media pH with NAOS were almost the same as that with FOS. In vivo, NAOS significantly increased the numbers of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria (P<0.05) in fresh feces or cecal content while reducing putrefactive microorganisms. Mice fed with 2.5% (w/v) NAOS for 7 days had larger increases in colonic beneficial bacteria population than those fed with even 5% (w/v) FOS for 14 days. No side effects, such as eructation and bloating, were found. Interestingly, NAOS with higher degrees of polymerization (DP) showed better prebiotic activity. These results indicated that NAOS had great prebiotic effect, which could be beneficial to the host.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agarose hydrolysates (NAOS) increase bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in mice and lower Bacteroides compared to FOS controls.
“Similar increases were observed by [138] in mice fed with diets supplemented with agarose hydrolysates (NAOS). Moreover, a lower number of Bacteroides compared to the controls fed with FOS, were observed [135].”
From The Potential of Seaweeds as a Source of Functional Ingredients of Prebiotic and Antioxidant Value (2019) · cites this paper as [138]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Hu, B., Gong, Q., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Li, J., & Yu, W.
- Affiliations
- Ocean University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Wengong
- Venue
- Anaerobe
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 260-266
- ISSN
- 1075-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003925608
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anaerobe (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- prebiotic activity, Bifidobacterium, lactobacilli, fructooligosaccharides, degree of polymerization, gut microbiota, putrefactive bacteria, dietary oligosaccharides
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bifidobacterium, Cecum, Digestion, Feces, Female, Lactobacillus, Oligosaccharides, Sepharose, Ecosystem, Probiotics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review