The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organized flight in birds
Open accessAbstract
The organized flight of birds is one of the most easily observed, yet challenging to study, phenomena in biology. Birds that fly in organized groups generally do so in one of two fashions: Line formations and Cluster formations. The former groups are typical of large birds such as waterfowl, where birds fly arranged in single lines, often joined together. The scientific questions about these groups usually involve potential adaptive functions, such as why geese fly in a V. Cluster formations are typically made up of large numbers of smaller birds such as pigeons or starlings flying in more irregular arrangements that have a strong three-dimensional character. The groups are defined by synchronized and apparently simultaneous rapid changes in direction. Scientific questions about these groups are usually concerned with mechanism such as how synchrony is achieved. Although field observations about the phenomenon date to the origins of natural history, experimental studies did not begin until the 1970s. Early experimenters and theoreticians were primarily biologists, but more recently aeronautical engineers, mathematicians, computer scientists and, currently, physicists have been attracted to the study of organized flight. Computer modelling has recently generated striking visual representations of organized flight and a number of hypotheses about its functions and mechanisms, but the ability to test these hypotheses lags behind the capacity to generate them. We suggest that a multi disciplinary approach to the phenomenon will be necessary to resolve apparently conflicting current hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923
Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03236 · Cited by 2,753
Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/129263c0 · Cited by 57 · cited 2×
“where Selous made his observations was a centre of interest in ‘paranormal’ phenomena. Selous 80 never explored what the nature of thought transference might be. 81 Gerard (1943) was one of the first individuals to try to quantify turning behaviour in a flock.”
Cited by
Vicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923
Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks
Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D., & Vicsek, T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08891 · Cited by 1,053
The rise of intelligent matter
Kaspar, C., Ravoo, B. J., van der Wiel, W. G., Wegner, S. V., & Pernice, W. H. P. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03453-y · Cited by 526
Information transfer and behavioural inertia in starling flocks
Attanasi, A., Cavagna, A., Del Castello, L., Giardina, I., Grigera, T. S., Jelić, A., Melillo, S., Parisi, L., Pohl, O., Shen, E., et al. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3035 · Cited by 408
Computational models for active matter
Shaebani, M. R., Wysocki, A., Winkler, R. G., Gompper, G., & Rieger, H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0152-1 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Bajec, I. L., & Heppner, F. H.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 777-789
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049383841
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organized flight in birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.007
- The paper
- Bajec, I. L., & Heppner, F. H. (2009). Organized flight in birds. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.