Cited by 125Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyAvian ecology and behavior

The quality of social relationships in ravens

Open access
Fraser, Orlaith N., Bugnyar, Thomas·2010·Animal Behaviour

Abstract

The quality of a social relationship represents the history of past social interactions between two individuals, from which the nature and outcome of future interactions can be predicted. Current theory predicts that relationship quality comprises three separate components, its value, compatibility and security. This study is the first to investigate the components of relationship quality in a large-brained bird. Following methods recently used to obtain quantitative measures of each relationship quality component in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, we entered data on seven behavioural variables from a group of 11 ravens, Corvus corax, into a principal components analysis. The characteristics of the extracted components matched those predicted for value, compatibility and security, and were labelled as such. When the effects of kinship and sex combination on each relationship quality component were analysed, we found that kin had more valuable relationships, whereas females had less secure and compatible relationships, although the effect of sex combination on compatibility only applied to nonkin. These patterns are consistent with what little knowledge we have of raven relationships from aviary studies and show that the components of relationship quality in ravens may indeed be analogous to those in chimpanzees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.008

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social bonds in birds reflect a lifetime of interactions for evaluating mate choice, and for establishing relationships and parental behavior.

    “Social bonds in birds reflect a lifetime of interactions for evaluating mate choice (Dubois et al., 1998), and for establishing relationships and parental behavior (Fraser and Bugnyar, 2010).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Fraser and Bugnyar, 2010

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes raven pair bonds as long-term investments tied to consistent interactions over time, supporting the relationship portion of the claim. Our copy does not link those bonds to parental behavior, and its findings concern primarily young, aviary-housed ravens rather than birds generally. The mate-choice clause is attributed to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Emery NJ Watanabe S Are corvids ‘feathered apes’? Cognitive evolution in crows, jays, rooks and jackdaws Comparative Analysis of Minds 2004 181 213 Keio University Press Tokyo
  2. Hamilton WD Genetical evolution of social behaviour 1 & 2 Journal of Theoretical Biology 1964 7 1 52 5875341
  3. Harcourt AH de Waal FBM Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals 1992 Oxford University Press Oxford
  4. Ratcliffe D The Raven 1997 Academic Press San Diego
  5. van Schaik CP Aureli F Aureli F de Waal FBM The natural history of valuable relationships in primates Natural Conflict Resolution 2000 307 333 University of California Press Berkeley
  6. Zabel CJ Glickman SE Frank LG Woodmansee KB Keppel G Harcourt AH de Waal FBM Coalition formation in a colony of prepubertal spotted hyenas Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals 1992 112 135 Oxford University Press Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraser, O. N., & Bugnyar, T.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Fraser, Orlaith N.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
927-933
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135746266
Cited by
125
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York (COCOR I-105-G11)
  • Austrian Science Fund (Y366-B17)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
relationship quality, ravens, Corvus corax, interpersonal relationships, relationship value, relationship compatibility, relationship security, kinship, sex differences, chimpanzees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review