The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig
Open accessAbstract
An optimally functioning gastrointestinal tract (GIT) clearly is of importance to the overall metabolism, physiology, disease status and performance of pigs of all stages of growth and development. Recently, the 'health' of the GIT ('gut health') has attracted much attention despite the lack of a clear definition to the term or its aetiology, although in broad terms, 'gut health' encompasses a number of physiological and functional features including nutrient digestion and absorption, host metabolism and energy generation, a stable and appropriate microbiota/microbiome, defence mechanisms including barrier function and mucosal immune mechanisms, and the interactions between these components. 'Gut health' in the newly-weaned (young) pig is of obvious interest due to changes in GIT structure and function associated with the post-weaning transition, and more recently to the upsurge in interest in different feed additives as dietary alternatives/replacements caused by bans/reductions in certain antimicrobial compounds being available in some parts of the world. In the presence of enteric disease(s) after weaning, a deterioration in 'gut health' may be synonymous to the overall health of the pig, and although some direct relationships can be drawn between pig performance and efficiency and a 'healthy' GIT, sometimes this connection is subtler and less obvious, especially in the absence of overt enteric disease(s). The factors and conditions involved in 'gut health' are multifactorial, complex, often poorly described and sometimes incorrectly interpreted, although it is evident that perturbations of the GIT can cause an imbalance and disturb the generalized homeostasis. In addition to any enteric diseases or conditions that might arise as a result of these disturbances, other influences will also impact such as the responses occurring in the GIT in the period immediately after weaning, any changes that might occur after a change in diet, and (or) disruptions to meal patterns and hence the flow of nutrients. Ultimately, 'gut health' represents the outcome of the GIT in response to its capacity and ability to respond and adapt to the insults and challenges it encounters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems.
(2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 2,540
Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action
Dibner, J. J., & Richards, J. D. (2005) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/84.4.634 · Cited by 1,432
Neufeld, K. M., Kang, N., Bienenstock, J., & Foster, J. A. (2011) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01620.x · Cited by 1,392
Stress & the gut-brain axis: Regulation by the microbiome
Foster, J. A., Rinaman, L., & Cryan, J. F. (2017) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2017.03.001 · Cited by 1,150
Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review
Pluske, J. R., Hampson, D. J., & Williams, I. H. (1997) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(97)00057-2 · Cited by 1,099
Self-citationIn-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome
Looft, T., Johnson, T. A., Allen, H. K., Bayles, D. O., Alt, D. P., Stedtfeld, R. D., Sul, W. J., Stedtfeld, T. M., Chai, B., Cole, J. R., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1120238109 · Cited by 1,072
Montagne, L., Pluske, J. R., & Hampson, D. J. (2003) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00163-9 · Cited by 997
Self-citationIntestinal barrier function in health and gastrointestinal disease
Camilleri, M., Madsen, K., Spiller, R., Van Meerveld, B. G., & Verne, G. N. (2012) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01921.x · Cited by 908
Fairbrother, J. M., Nadeau, É., & Gyles, C. L. (2005) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/ahr2005105 · Cited by 896
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Postweaning Piglets: Understanding the Keys to Health
Gresse, R., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Fleury, M. A., Van de Wiele, T., Forano, E., & Blanquet-Diot, S. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004 · Cited by 890
Cited by
Jackman, J. A., Boyd, R. D., & Elrod, C. C. (2020) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-020-00446-1 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Pluske, J. R., Turpin, D. L., & Kim, J.-C.
- Venue
- Animal Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-196
- ISSN
- 2405-6383 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-6545
- OpenAlex
- W2782703359
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 35.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.004
- The paper
- Pluske, J. R., Turpin, D. L., & Kim, J.-C. (2018). Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. Animal Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.