Cited by 748Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsMast cells and histamine

Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium

Sampson, Hugh A., Muñoz-Furlong, Anne, Campbell, Ronna L., Adkinson, N. Franklin, Allan Bock, S., Branum, Amy, Brown, Simon G.A., Camargo, Carlos A. +18 more·2006·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

There is no universal agreement on the definition of anaphylaxis or the criteria for diagnosis. In July 2005, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network convened a second meeting on anaphylaxis, which included representatives from 16 different organizations or government bodies, including representatives from North America, Europe, and Australia, to continue working toward a universally accepted definition of anaphylaxis, establish clinical criteria that would accurately identify cases of anaphylaxis with high precision, further review the evidence on the most appropriate management of anaphylaxis, and outline the research needs in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sampson, H. A., Muñoz-Furlong, A., Campbell, R. L., Adkinson, N. F., Allan Bock, S., Branum, A., Brown, S. G. A., Camargo, C. A., Cydulka, R., Galli, S. J., Gidudu, J., Gruchalla, R. S., Harlor, A. D., Hepner, D. L., Lewis, L. M., Lieberman, P. L., Metcalfe, D. D., O’Connor, R., Muraro, A., Rudman, A., Schmitt, C., Scherrer, D., Simons, F. E., Thomas, S., Wood, J. P., & Decker, W. W.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Fremantle Hospital (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (US)
  • Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • American College of Emergency Physicians (US)
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
373-380
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140341488
Cited by
748
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 35
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
Keywords
anaphylaxis, anaphylaxis diagnosis, clinical criteria, anaphylaxis management, food allergy, research needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review