Cited by 367Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Crowding Delays Treatment and Lengthens Emergency Department Length of Stay, Even Among High-Acuity Patients

Open access
McCarthy, Melissa L., Zeger, Scott L., Ding, Ru, Levin, Scott R., Desmond, Jeffrey S., Lee, Jennifer, Aronsky, Dominik·2009·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objective We determine the effect of crowding on emergency department (ED) waiting room, treatment, and boarding times across multiple sites and acuity groups. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study that included ED visit and inpatient medicine occupancy data for a 1-year period at 4 EDs. We measured crowding at 30-minute intervals throughout each patient's ED stay. We estimated the effect of crowding on waiting room time, treatment time, and boarding time separately, using discrete-time survival analysis with time-dependent crowding measures (ie, number waiting, number being treated, number boarding, and inpatient medicine occupancy rate), controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Results Crowding substantially delayed patients' waiting room and boarding times but not treatment time. During the day shift, when the number boarding increased from the 50th to the 90th percentile, the adjusted median waiting room time (range 26 to 70 minutes) increased by 6% to 78% (range 33 to 82 minutes), and the adjusted median boarding time (range 250 to 626 minutes) increased by 15% to 47% (range 288 to 921 minutes), depending on the site. Crowding delayed the care of high-acuity level 2 patients at all sites. During crowded periods (ie, 90%), the adjusted median waiting room times of high-acuity level 2 patients were 3% to 35% higher than during normal periods, depending on the site and crowding measure. Conclusion Using discrete-time survival analysis, we were able to dynamically measure crowding throughout each patient's ED visit and demonstrate its deleterious effect on the timeliness of emergency care, even for high-acuity patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A longer emergency department length of stay is associated with poor outcomes.

    “A longer emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) is associated with poor outcomes.”

    From Shorter laboratory turnaround time is associated with shorter emergency department length of stay: a retrospective cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (page not available) calls ED length of stay an important measure of quality of care, and the Discussion reports that crowding lengthens ED stays and delays care. Neither passage establishes that a longer ED stay is associated with poor patient outcomes; the paper examines timeliness rather than that association. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Extended lengths of stay lead to crowding in the ED, which is associated with worse outcomes, including death.

    “Extended lengths of stay lead to crowding in the ED, which in turn is associated with worse outcomes, including death [6–8].”

    From Shorter laboratory turnaround time is associated with shorter emergency department length of stay: a retrospective cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion says prolonged ED boarding impedes patient flow, supporting a link between extended stays and crowding. It also reports that crowding delays care, but the paper does not establish that crowding is associated with death; its principal finding is that crowding lengthens ED stays. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Haradan C, Nolan T, Resar R, et al. Optimizing Patient Flow: Moving Patients Smoothly Through Acute Care Settings. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. IHI Innovation Series White Paper.
  2. Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, M. L., Zeger, S. L., Ding, R., Levin, S. R., Desmond, J. S., Lee, J., & Aronsky, D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Melissa L.
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
492-503.e4
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150179549
Cited by
367
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
emergency department overcrowding, emergency department length of stay, boarding time, treatment duration, high-acuity patients, discrete-time survival analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bed Occupancy, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States, Waiting Lists, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review