The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Neoplasia in the Small Intestine
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The mucosa of the small intestine encompasses about 90% of the luminal surface area of the digestive system, but only 2% of the total annual gastrointestinal cancer incidence in the United States. METHODS: The remarkable contrast in age-standardized cancer incidence between the small and large intestine has been reviewed with respect to the cell type patterns, demographic features, and molecular characteristics of neoplasms. RESULTS: Particularly noteworthy is the predominance of adenocarcinoma in the colon, which exceeds 98% of the total incidence by cell type, in contrast to that of 30% to 40% in the small intestine, resulting in an age-standardized ratio of rates exceeding 50-fold. The prevalence of adenomas and carcinomas is most prominent in the duodenum and proximal jejunum. The positive correlation in global incidence rates of small and large intestinal neoplasms and the reciprocal increases in risk of second primary adenocarcinomas suggest that there are common environmental risk factors. The pathophysiology of Crohn inflammatory bowel disease and the elevated risk of adenocarcinoma demonstrate the significance of the impaired integrity of the mucosal barrier and of aberrant immune responses to luminal indigenous and potentially pathogenic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: In advancing a putative mechanism for the contrasting mucosal susceptibilities of the small and large intestine, substantial differences are underscored in the diverse taxonomy, concentration and metabolic activity of anaerobic organisms, rate of intestinal transit, changing pH, and the enterohepatic recycling and metabolism of bile acids. Experimental and epidemiologic studies are cited that suggest that the changing microecology, particularly in the colon, is associated with enhanced metabolic activation of ingested and endogenously formed procarcinogenic substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boffetta, P., & Hashibe, M. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70577-0 · Cited by 877
A prospective study of obesity and cancer risk (Sweden)
Wolk, A., Gridley, G., Svensson, M., Nyrén, O., McLaughlin, J. K., Fraumeni, J. F., & Adami, H.-O. (2001) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1008995217664 · Cited by 581
Pischon, T., Lahmann, P. H., Boeing, H., Friedenreich, C., Norat, T., Tjønneland, A., Halkjaer, J., Overvad, K., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., et al. (2006) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djj246 · Cited by 554
Payne, C. M., Weber, C., Crowley-Skillicorn, C., Dvorak, K., Bernstein, H., Bernstein, C., Holubec, H., Dvorakova, B., & Garewal, H. (2007) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgl139 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gut
La Rosa, S., Uccella, S., & Rindi, G. (2021) · The Spectrum of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54391-4_10 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Schottenfeld, D., Beebe-Dimmer, J. L., & Vigneau, F. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-69
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134447882
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Neoplasia in the Small Intestine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.004
- The paper
- Schottenfeld, D., Beebe-Dimmer, J. L., & Vigneau, F. D. (2009). The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Neoplasia in the Small Intestine. Annals of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.