Cited by 28Renal cell carcinoma treatmentCancer Risks and FactorsPhysical Activity and Health

A prospective analysis of prolonged sitting time and risk of renal cell carcinoma among 300,000 older adults

Open access
George, Stephanie M., Moore, Steven C., Chow, Wong-Ho, Schatzkin, Arthur, Hollenbeck, Albert R., Matthews, Charles E.·2011·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose Accumulating evidence suggests an etiologic role in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for physical activity. However, it is unknown if prolonged sitting, which is thought to be distinct from too little moderate-vigorous physical activity, is an independent risk factor for RCC. The authors prospectively examined the relationship of prolonged sitting and risk of RCC among 289,512 women and men in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.Methods From 1996 through 2006, 1206 invasive RCC cancer cases were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate multivariate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.Results After controlling for known risk factors for RCC, we did not find evidence of associations between RCC risk and time spent per day sitting while watching television or videos (HR(7 + hrs: < 1 hr) = 0.96 (0.66, 1.38); p trend = 0.707) or total sitting time (HR(9 + hrs: < 3 hrs) = 1.11 (0.87, 1.41); p trend = 0.765).Conclusions Prolonged sitting time was not associated with RCC risk among men and women in this large cohort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.04.012

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant independent association between sitting time and invasive breast cancer risk and risk of renal cell carcinoma was not shown, although a weak correlation could not be ruled out.

    “However, association between sitting time and invasive breast cancer risk and risk of renal cell carcinoma has been specifically examined and significant independent association was not shown, although a weak correlation could not be ruled out [31,32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, S. M., Moore, S. C., Chow, W.-H., Schatzkin, A., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Matthews, C. E.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • AARP (US)
Corresponding author
George, Stephanie M.
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
787-790
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112589200
Cited by
28
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
  • National Cancer Institute (Y99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
prolonged sitting, sedentary behavior, renal cell carcinoma, cancer risk, television viewing, older adults, physical activity, AARP Diet and Health Study
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Female, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review