Cited by 85Cancer Risks and FactorsPhysical Activity and HealthGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Beyond recreational physical activity: Examining occupational and household activity, transportation activity, and sedentary behavior in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer risk

Open access
George, Stephanie M., Irwin, Melinda L., Matthews, Charles E., Mayne, Susan T., Gail, Mitchell H., Moore, Steven C., Albanes, Demetrius, Ballard-Barbash, Rachel +3 more·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively examined nonrecreational physical activity and sedentary behavior in relation to breast cancer risk among 97 039 postmenopausal women in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. METHODS: We identified 2866 invasive and 570 in situ breast cancer cases recorded between 1996 and 2003 and used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate multivariate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Routine activity during the day at work or at home that included heavy lifting or carrying versus mostly sitting was associated with reduced risk of invasive breast cancer (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.42, 0.91; P(trend) = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Routine activity during the day at work or home may be related to reduced invasive breast cancer risk. Domains outside of recreation time may be attractive targets for increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior among postmenopausal women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.180828

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • George et al. reported that 7.9% of females sat all day.

    “This is comparable to 7.9% of females reported “sitting all day” reported by George et al. [31].”
  • Significant independent association between sitting time and invasive breast cancer risk and risk of renal cell carcinoma was not shown, although a weak correlation could not be ruled out.

    “However, association between sitting time and invasive breast cancer risk and risk of renal cell carcinoma has been specifically examined and significant independent association was not shown, although a weak correlation could not be ruled out [31,32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [53]National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Paper presented at: National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference September 22–24, 2009 Bethesda, MD

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, S. M., Irwin, M. L., Matthews, C. E., Mayne, S. T., Gail, M. H., Moore, S. C., Albanes, D., Ballard-Barbash, R., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A., & Leitzmann, M. F.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • AARP (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-11
Volume
100
Issue
11
Pages
2288-2295
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2032064308
Cited by
85
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Florida Department of Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA105666)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
postmenopausal breast cancer, occupational physical activity, household physical activity, sedentary behavior, heavy lifting, transportation activity, breast cancer risk, postmenopausal women
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Breast Neoplasms, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Recreation, Risk, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Transportation, United States, Exercise, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Workplace, Postmenopause, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review