Cited by 81Health disparities and outcomesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Education

The Socioeconomic Gradient of Diabetes Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control Among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study

Open access
Sims, Mario, Diez Roux, Ana V., Boykin, Shawn, Sarpong, Daniel, Gebreab, Samson Y., Wyatt, Sharon B., Hickson, DeMarc, Payton, Marinelle +2 more·2011·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose Little research has focused on the social patterning of diabetes among African Americans. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes among African Americans.Methods Education, income and occupation were examined among 4,303 participants (2,726 women and 1,577 men). Poisson regression estimated relative probabilities (RP) of diabetes outcomes by SES.Results The prevalence of diabetes was 19.6% in women and 15.9% in men. Diabetes awareness, treatment, and control were 90.0%, 86.8%, and 39.2% in women, respectively, and 88.2%, 84.4%, and 35.9% in men, respectively. In adjusted models, low-income men and women had greater probabilities of diabetes than high-income men and women (RP, 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.92; and RP, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.74, respectively). Lack of awareness was associated with low education and low occupation in women (RP, 2.28; 95%CI 1.01-5.18; and RP, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.08-6.33, respectively) but not in men. Lack of treatment was associated with low education in women. Diabetes control was not patterned by SES.Conclusions Diabetes prevalence is patterned by SES, and awareness and treatment are patterned by SES in women but not men. Efforts to prevent diabetes in African Americans need to address the factors that place those of low SES at higher risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.05.006

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower SES is associated with being less physically active, having a higher risk of diabetes, and being more likely to have hypertension and to smoke.

    “Researchers report that lower SES is associated with being less physically active, 159 having a higher risk of diabetes, [160][161][162] and being more likely to have hypertension 163 and to smoke 164 -all of which are risk factors for dementia.”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [161]

  • Lower SES is associated with being less physically active, having a higher risk of diabetes, and being more likely to have hypertension and to smoke.

    “Researchers report that lower SES is associated with being less physically active, 172 having a higher risk of diabetes, 173 , 174 , 175 and being more likely to have hypertension 176 and to smoke 177 — all of which are risk factors for dementia.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [174]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Health, United States, 2007: With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans Hyattsville, MD National Center for Health Statistics 2007 20698068

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sims, M., Diez Roux, A. V., Boykin, S., Sarpong, D., Gebreab, S. Y., Wyatt, S. B., Hickson, D., Payton, M., Ekunwe, L., & Taylor, H. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Jackson State University (US)
  • Tougaloo College (US)
Corresponding author
Sims, Mario
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
892-898
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047063260
Cited by
81
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95170-30-0-1, n01hc95171-31-0-1, n01hc95172-31-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL084682, N01 HC095171, N01 HC095172, N01HC95172, K01HL08468-04, N01 HC095170, N01 HC 95170, N01 HC-95171)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD002249)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, socioeconomic status, African Americans, diabetes prevalence, diabetes awareness, diabetes treatment, glycemic control, income, occupation, sex differences, social patterning of health, Jackson Heart Study
MeSH terms
Awareness, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Social Class, United States, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Poisson Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review