Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A full cost environmental accounting experiment

Herbohn, Kathleen·2005·Accounting, Organizations and Society
DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Arrington, 1991, Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 1
  2. Bebbington, 1998, Full cost accounting from an environmental perspective: Review, Social and Environmental Accounting, 18, 1, 10.1080/0969160X.1998.9651578 · doi:10.1080/0969160x.1998.9651578
  3. Bebbington, 2001, An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a reconceptualisation, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 557, 10.1006/cpac.2000.0450 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bebbington, 1996, Accounting for sustainability, Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 75, 75
  5. Bebbington, 1997, Accounting for sustainability, Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 76, 37
  6. Belkaoui, 1976, The impact of the disclosure of the environmental effects of organisational behaviour on the market, Financial Management, 26, 10.2307/3665454 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Belkaoui, 1989, Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 2, 36, 10.1108/09513578910132240 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bennett, 1996, The contingent valuation method: A post-Kakadu assessment, Agenda, 3, 185
  9. Boone, 1997, Natural solution, CA Magazine, 130, 18
  10. Christenson, 1983, The methodology of positive accounting, The Accounting Review, 1
  11. Cowen, 1987, The impacts of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 12, 111, 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deegan, 1998, Environmental reporting in Australia: We’re moving along the road, but there’s still a long way to go, Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 15, 246
  13. Deegan, 1996, A study of environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations, Accounting and Business Research, 26, 187, 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dey, 2000, Bookkeeping and ethnography at Traidcraft plc: A review of an experiment in social accounting, Social and Environmental Accounting, 20, 16, 10.1080/0969160X.2000.9651638 · doi:10.1080/0969160x.2000.9651638
  15. Dey, 1995, Toward social information systems and bookkeeping: A note on developing mechanisms for social accounting and audit, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2, 36
  16. Dierkes, 1977, Corporate social accounting for the physical environment—A critical review and implementation proposal, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 2, 3, 10.1016/0361-3682(77)90003-4 · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(77)90003-4
  17. Frawley, K. (1988). The history of conservation and the national park concept in Australia: A state of knowledge review. In Proceedings of the first national conference on Australian forest history, pp. 395–417
  18. Gibson, 1996, The problem with reporting pollution allowances: Reporting is not the problem, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7, 655, 10.1006/cpac.1996.0073 · doi:10.1006/cpac.1996.0073
  19. Gray, 1995, Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 8, 47, 10.1108/09513579510146996 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gray, 1995, The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organizational change, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6, 211, 10.1006/cpac.1995.1021 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Guba, 1981, Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication and Technology, 28, 75, 10.1007/BF02766777 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Herbohn, 2000, An alternative approach to accounting for natural resources: The case of multi-purpose forestry in Australia, Society and Natural Resources, 13, 1
  23. Herbohn, 2002, Forestry managers’ perceptions of the feasibility of incorporating non-market value estimates in financial environmental reporting, Economic Analysis and Policy, 32, 131, 10.1016/S0313-5926(02)50022-9 · doi:10.1016/s0313-5926(02)50022-9
  24. Herbohn, 1999, Accounting for forests in social, economic and political contexts, Accounting Forum, 23, 408, 10.1111/1467-6303.00023 · doi:10.1111/1467-6303.00023
  25. Hines, 1991, On valuing nature, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 4, 27, 10.1108/09513579110144802 · DOI
  26. Hines, 1992, Accounting: Filling the negative space, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17, 313, 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90027-P · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ingram, 1978, An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures, Journal of Accounting Research, 16, 270, 10.2307/2490567 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jaggi, 1982, An analysis of the information content of pollution disclosures, Financial Review, 19, 142, 10.1111/j.1540-6288.1982.tb00497.x · DOI
  29. Kirchioff, 1997, Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 75, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0981 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Larringa, 2001, Environmental accounting perspectives—Organisational change or institutional appropriation, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 269, 10.1006/cpac.2000.0433 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lehman, 1995, A legitimate concern for environmental accounting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6, 393, 10.1006/cpac.1995.1037 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lehman, 1996, Environmental accounting: Pollution permits or selling the environment, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7, 667, 10.1006/cpac.1996.0075 · DOI
  33. Lehman, 1998, Corporate environmental reporting: Some critical thoughts, Social and Environmental Accounting, 18, 9, 10.1080/0969160X.1998.9651571 · doi:10.1080/0969160x.1998.9651571
  34. Mak, 1991, Corporate characteristics and the voluntary disclosures of forecast information: A study of New Zealand prospectuses, British Accounting Review, 23, 305, 10.1016/0890-8389(91)90065-A · DOI
  35. Maunders, 1991, Accounting and ecological crisis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 4, 9, 10.1108/09513579110003277 · DOI · Paper page
  36. McKinnon, 1988, Reliability and validity in field research: Some strategies and tactics, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 1, 34, 10.1108/EUM0000000004619 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Milne, 1991, Accounting, environmental resource values, and non-market valuation techniques for environmental resources: A review, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 4, 81, 10.1108/09513579110003583 · DOI
  38. Ness, 1991, Corporate social disclosure: A note on a test of agency theory, British Accounting Review, 23, 211, 10.1016/0890-8389(91)90081-C · DOI · Paper page
  39. Palmer, 1998, The economics of environmental improvement: Will SMEs grasp the nettle of environmental accounting?, Social and Environmental Accounting, 18, 5, 10.1080/0969160X.1998.9651586 · DOI
  40. Patten, 1991, Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 297, 10.1016/0278-4254(91)90003-3 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Patten, 1992, Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory, Accounting Organisations and Society, 17, 471, 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90042-Q · DOI · Paper page
  42. Peace, R. (1997). Natural resource value. In Conference proceedings of the 5th interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting conference, North Carolina State University
  43. Puxty, 1986, Social accounting as immanent legitimation: A critique of a technist ideology, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 95
  44. Roberts, 1992, Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17, 595, 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K · DOI · Paper page
  45. Shane, 1983, Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm, The Accounting Review, 58, 521
  46. Tinker, 1991, Fatal attractions in the agency relationship, British Accounting Review, 23, 329, 10.1016/0890-8389(91)90067-C · DOI
  47. Ullman, 1985, Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships between social disclosures and economic performance of US firms, Academy of Management Review, 10, 540, 10.2307/258135 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Yin, 1994, vol. 5

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Herbohn, K.
Venue
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
519-536
ISSN
0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.001
OpenAlex
W1977103112
Cited by
186
References
2
FWCI
27.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A full cost environmental accounting experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.001
The paper
Herbohn, K. (2005). A full cost environmental accounting experiment. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.