Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,035

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements

Dekker, Henri C·2004·Accounting, Organizations and Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00056-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Anderson, 2000, Sourcing parts of complex products, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 723, 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00015-5 · DOI
  2. Borys, 1989, Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances, Academy of Management Review, 14, 234, 10.5465/amr.1989.4282106 · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4282106 · Paper page
  3. Chiles, 1996, Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics, Academy of Management Review, 21, 73, 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161566 · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161566 · Paper page
  4. Das, 1998, Between trust and control, Academy of Management Review, 23, 491, 10.5465/amr.1998.926623 · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926623 · Paper page
  5. Dyer, 1996, Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 271, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199604)17:4<271::AID-SMJ807>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dyer, 1998, The relational view, Academy of Management Review, 23, 660, 10.2307/259056 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fisher, 1995, Contingency-based research in management control systems, Journal of Accounting Literature, 14, 24
  8. Frances, 1996, Supermarkets and suppliers in the UK, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 591, 10.1016/0361-3682(96)00001-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gietzman, 1996, Incomplete contracts and the make or buy decision, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 611, 10.1016/0361-3682(96)00002-5 · DOI
  10. Grandori, 1997, An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes, Organization Studies, 18, 897, 10.1177/017084069701800601 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Groot, 2000, Control of international joint-ventures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 579, 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00057-4 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gulati, 1995, Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85, 10.2307/256729 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gulati, 1998, Alliances and networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gulati, 1998, The architecture of cooperation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781, 10.2307/2393616 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hopwood, 1996, Looking across rather than up and down, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 589, 10.1016/0361-3682(96)81805-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ireland, 2002, Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 28, 413, 10.1177/014920630202800308 · doi:10.1177/014920630202800308 · Paper page
  17. Ittner, 1999, Supplier selection, monitoring practices, and firm performance, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 18, 253, 10.1016/S0278-4254(99)00003-4 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jones, 1997, A general theory of network governance, Academy of Management Review, 22, 911, 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109 · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109 · Paper page
  19. Kale, 2000, Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kraljic, 1983, Purchasing must become supply management, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 109
  21. Larson, 1992, Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76, 10.2307/2393534 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nooteboom, 1997, Effects of trust and governance on relational risk, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 308, 10.2307/256885 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Osborn, 1990, Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 503, 10.2307/256578 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Osborn, 1997, The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 261, 10.2307/256883 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Otley, 1994, Management control in contemporary organizations, Management Accounting Research, 5, 289, 10.1006/mare.1994.1018 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ouchi, 1979, A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms, Management Science, 25, 833, 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Poppo, 2002, Do formal contracts and relational governance act as substitutes or complements?, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707, 10.1002/smj.249 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ring, 1992, Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483, 10.1002/smj.4250130702 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rousseau, 1998, Not so different after all, Academy of Management Review, 3, 393, 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Saxton, 1997, The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 443, 10.2307/256890 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Smith, 1995, Intra- and interorganizational cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 7, 10.2307/256726 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sobrero, 1998, Structuring inter-firm relationships, Organization Studies, 19, 585, 10.1177/017084069801900403 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Speklé, 2001, Explaining management control structure variety, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 419, 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00041-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Tomkins, 2001, Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 161, 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00018-0 · DOI
  35. Uzzi, 1997, Social structure and competition in interfirm networks, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35, 10.2307/2393808 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Van der Meer-Kooistra, 2000, Management control of interfirm transactional relationships, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 51, 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00021-5 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Williamson, 1999, Strategic research, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1087, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zaheer, 1995, Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373, 10.1002/smj.4250160504 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Zajac, 1993, From transaction cost to transactional value analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 30, 131, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00298.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,035

Metadata

Authors
Dekker, H. C.
Venue
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
27-49
ISSN
0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995434524
Cited by
1,035
References
3
FWCI
43.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00056-9
The paper
Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00056-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.