Cited by 424Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureOptimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid Energy Management

A spatial–temporal model for grid impact analysis of plug-in electric vehicles

Open access
Mu, Yunfei, Wu, Jianzhong, Jenkins, Nick, Jia, Hongjie, Wang, Chengshan·2014·Applied Energy

Abstract

A Spatial–Temporal model (STM) was developed to evaluate the impact of large scale deployment of plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) on urban distribution networks. The STM runs based on the integration of power system analysis and transportation analysis. Origin–Destination (OD) analysis from intelligent transportation research was used to model the EV mobility. Based on the EV technical and market information provided by the EU MERGE project and the output of OD analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation method was developed within the STM to obtain the EV charging load of each load busbar over time. The STM aims to facilitate power system evaluation and planning, and is able to provide both average values and probabilities of nodal bus voltages and branch loadings. The STM is able to identify the critical network components that will require to be upgraded. A high customer density urban network from the United Kingdom Generic Distribution System combined with geographic information was used as a test system. Two EV charging strategies, “dumb” charging and “smart” charging, were simulated and compared under different EV penetration levels (0%, 25% and 50%) to verify the effectiveness of STM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncoordinated EV charging can cause considerable congestion in electrical networks, especially in residential areas.

    “Since drivers tend to change in times when electrical grids are already highly loaded, for example after going back home from work, EVs can cause considerable congestion in electrical networks [4,5], especially in residential areas.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Doucette RT, McCulloch MD. Modeling the prospects of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to reduce CO 2 emissions. Appl Energy 2011;88(7):2315-23.
  2. Lopes JAP, Soares FJ, Almeida PMR. Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proc IEEE 2011;99(1):168-83.
  3. Schroeder A. Modeling storage and demand management in power distribution grids. Appl Energy 2011;88(12):4700-12.
  4. Brouwer AS, Kuramochi T, van den Broek M, Faaij A. Fulfilling the electricity demand of electric vehicles in the long term future: an evaluation of centralized and decentralized power supply systems. Appl Energy 2013;107:33-51.
  5. Gomez JC, Morcos MM. Impacts of EV battery chargers on the power quality of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Del 2003;18(3):975-81.
  6. Qian KJ, Zhou CZ, Allan M, Yuan Y. Modeling of load demand due to EV battery charging in distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011;26(2):802-10.
  7. Li G, Zhang XP. Modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging demand in probabilistic power flow calculations. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012;3(1):492-9.
  8. Lojowska A, Kurowicka D, Papaefthymiou G, Van der Sluis L. Stochastic modeling of power demand due to EVs using Copula. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012;27(4):1960-8.
  9. Bae S, Kwasinski A. Spatial and temporal model of electric vehicle charging demand. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012;3(1):394-403.
  10. Soares FJ, Lopes JAP, Almeida PMR. A Monte Carlo method to evaluate electric vehicles impacts in distribution networks. In: IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply (CITRES), Waltham, USA; 2010.
  11. Kelly JC, MacDonald JS, Keoleian GA. Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics. Appl Energy 2012;94:395-405.
  12. Saarenpää J, Kolehmainen M, Niska H. Geodemographic analysis and estimation of early plug-in hybrid electric vehicle adoption. Appl Energy 2013;107:456-64.
  13. Zhao Y. Mobile phone location determination and its impact on intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2000;1(1):55-64.
  14. De Dios Ortuzar J, Willumsen LG. Modelling transport, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2001.
  15. Sultana A, Kumar A. Optimal siting and size of bioenergy facilities using geographic information system. Appl Energy 2012;94(6):192-201.
  16. Muselli G, Notton G, Poggi P, Louche A. Computer-aided analysis of the integration of renewable-energy systems in remote areas using a geographical-information system. Appl Energy 1999;63(3):141-60.
  17. Hu SR, Wang CM. Vehicle detector deployment strategies for the estimation of network Origin destination demands using partial link traffic counts. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2008;9(2):288-300.
  18. Seungkirl B, Hyunmyung K, Yongtaek L. Multiple-vehicle origin-destination matrix estimation from traffic counts using genetic algorithm. J Transp Eng 2004;130(3):339-47.
  19. Kudoh Y, Ishitani H, Matsuhashi R, Yoshida Y, Morita K, Katsuki S, et al. Environmental evaluation of introducing electric vehicles using a dynamic traffic flow model. Appl Energy 2001;69(2):145-59.
  20. Mu Y, Wu J, Ekanayake J, Jenkins N, Jia H. Primary frequency response from electric vehicles in the Great Britain power system. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2013;4(2):1142-50.
  21. De Moura AP, De Moura AAF. Newton-Raphson power flow with constant matrices: a comparison with decoupled power flow methods. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2013;46(1):108-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mu, Y., Wu, J., Jenkins, N., Jia, H., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wu, Jianzhong
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
114
Pages
456-465
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089574748
Cited by
424
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK (EP/I031707/1)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51361130152)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L001039/1, EP/E036503/1, EP/I031707/1, EP/K006274/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
plug-in electric vehicles, spatio-temporal modeling, urban distribution networks, electric vehicle charging load, origin-destination analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, EV penetration, smart charging, distribution network planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review