Cited by 49Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

A large-scale high-resolution geographic analysis of impacts of electric vehicle charging on low-voltage grids

Open access
Hartvigsson, Elias, Taljegard, Maria, Odenberger, Mikael, Chen, Peiyuan·2022·Energy

Abstract

Electric vehicles enable the decarbonization of the transportation sector. Yet, system implications of fully electrified private transportation on national low-voltage grids are still unknown. This study presents a geographic analysis of power system violations on a synthetically generated version of the Swedish low-voltage grid due to home charging of private passenger electric vehicles using different charging strategies. We link a national energy system model with a reference network model that together generate low-voltage proxy grids within each inhabited km2 of Sweden. We produce the first national coverage of electric vehicle charging impacts in residential areas. Our results show that the risk of power system violations due to electric vehicle charging are largest in cities and smaller in urban areas, while rural areas show significantly fewer violations. We also find that an electricity price optimized charging strategy primarily increases the risk of low-voltage power system violations in some city areas. In addition, we find large variations in power system violations in each of Sweden's four price areas. Direct charging is preferable in the far north while price optimized charging is preferable in the far south. The results show variations in impacts on distribution system operators from national low-cost renewable energy systems depending on their geographical location. The findings show important connections between national energy system models and local low-voltage grid violations.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study uses a reference network model and GPS driving data to estimate national Swedish low-voltage grid violations from residential EV charging under direct, price-optimized, and V2G strategies. It finds violations concentrated in city and urban areas, with rural areas largely unaffected, and substantial geographic variation by price area.

Key findings

  • City areas show an average probability of 24% power system violations at 100% EV integration, with some low-voltage grid cells at 0% and a few at 100%; rural areas show violations in about 1% of low-voltage grid cells.
  • Compared with direct charging, price-optimized charging without V2G improves power system violations in about 60% of low-voltage grid cells in both city and urban areas; in city areas, 25–45% of cases using price-optimized strategies (with or without V2G) deteriorate.
  • Geographic price-area variation is large: price-optimized charging produces fewer violations than direct charging in 20% of low-voltage grid cells in SE1 versus 99% in SE2; direct charging is preferable in the far north while price-optimized charging is preferable in the far south.
  • In city areas, price-optimized charging with V2G is likely net negative for power system violations, while in urban areas price-optimized charging is likely net positive.

Methods

  • Synthetic Swedish low-voltage grids are generated by a reference network model in 1 × 1 km² cells using GIS demographic and dwelling data plus low-voltage cable sizing regulations; the model includes residential customers and checks thermal limits and voltage at the point of common connection.
  • Grids are populated with 10-min annual household load profiles from the Swedish Energy Agency and EV charging profiles from 429 GPS-tracked combustion vehicles in western Sweden (2010–2012, at least 30 consecutive days), extrapolated to a full year; assumptions include 0.17 kWh/km, 100 kWh battery, 6.9 kW charging, and home charging only.
  • Three charging strategies are modeled: direct charging, price-optimized charging without V2G, and price-optimized charging with V2G; price-optimized profiles come from the ELIN-EPOD cost-minimization model with four Swedish price regions, and violations are expressed as a probability index using a bootstrap coincidence distribution with 1000 resamples per vehicle number and 100 household-load runs.

Limitations

  • Stated: there is a lack of data on electricity load and charging profiles from the same households; the study tested 1000 combinations but did not assess whether some combinations are more realistic than others.
  • Stated: the model excludes non-residential load, likely overestimating grid impacts in areas with significant commercial load, especially city centers; V2G is controlled only by regional price signals, not local voltage or frequency signals, and future work should include additional control signals.
  • Stated and evident: price-optimized charging profiles from ELIN-EPOD do not consider congestion in regional or local grids; driving patterns from combustion vehicles are assumed unchanged during large-scale EV adoption, and the synthetic proxy grids rely on assumptions such as average fuse size and customer distribution.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125180

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 22 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Study design and conductcitation

    The model does not consider congestions in the regional or local grids.

    “the model does not consider congestions in the regional or local grids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Taljegard, 2019, Electric vehicles as flexibility management strategy for the electricity system—a comparison between different regions of Europe, Energies source

      The modelling description (Renewable Technologies, page unavailable) represents countries as regions and includes transmission bottlenecks between them, so the claim is too broad if it includes regional transmission congestion. The described model does not represent congestion within those regions or in local grids. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Low-voltage grids have large variations in their design.

    “Low-voltage grids have large variations in their design [18].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Postigo Marcos, 2017, A review of power distribution test feeders in the United States and the need for synthetic representative networks, Energies source
  • Study design and conductcitation

    The theoretical low-voltage grids have been compared to real data [41].

    “The theoretical low-voltage grids have been compared to real data [41].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Hartvigsson, 2021, Estimating national and local low-voltage grid capacity for residential solar photovoltaic in Sweden, UK and Germany, Renew Energy source
  • Findingown data

    For 633 low-voltage grid cells, direct charging generates lower probability for power system violations than the two price optimized charging strategies.

    “For 633 low-voltage grid cells, direct charging generates lower probability for power system violations than the two price optimized charging strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Low-voltage grids in rural areas are unlikely to experience power system violations due to EV charging, regardless of combination of household load profiles and EV charging profiles, or choice of charging strategy.

    “The step like behavior seen in Fig. 5, together with the very large share of low-voltage grid cells with a 0% power system violations probability, shows that low-voltage grids in rural areas are unlikely to experience power system violations due to EV charging, regardless of combination of household load profiles and EV charging profiles, or choice of charging strategy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In urban areas, the overall behavior of low-voltage grid cells is similar to city areas, but with more grid cells that have a 100% probability for power system violations.

    “The overall behavior of low-voltage grid cells in urban areas is similar to city areas, but with more grid cells that have a 100% probability for power system violations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In city areas, only a few low-voltage grid cells show a 100% power system violations probability, and a significant number of low-voltage grid cells show 0% power system violations probability.

    “Only a few low-voltage grid cells show a 100% power system violations probability, and a significant number of low-voltage grid cells shows 0% power system violations probability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The risk of power system violations due to electric vehicle charging is largest in cities, smaller in urban areas, and significantly fewer in rural areas.

    “Our results show that the risk of power system violations due to electric vehicle charging are largest in cities and smaller in urban areas, while rural areas show significantly fewer violations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This primarily occurs in city centers, where the results from this study show the highest probability for power system violations when integrating a high share of EVs.

    “This primarily occurs in city centers, where the results from this study show the highest probability for power system violations when integrating a high share of EVs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    With 100% EV integration, there is an average probability of 24% of power system violations in city areas, with a significant number of low-voltage grids that do not experience any power system violations.

    “Our results show that with 100% EV integration, there is an average probability of 24% of power system violations in city areas, with a significant number of low-voltage grids that do not experience any power system violations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The three charging strategies used in this study were modeled assuming an electricity system without fossil fuels and with a full-scale deployment of EVs (i.e., all passenger vehicles are assumed to be EVs), which add a new household load.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Rural areas are mainly characterized by a difference in distribution but no difference in median deterioration.

    “Rural areas are mainly characterized by a difference in distribution but no difference in median deterioration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In city areas, price optimized charging without V2G causes fewer power system violations, while price optimized charging with V2G produces more power system violations compared with direct charging when using regional price signals for controlling V2G.

    “In city areas, our results show that price optimized charging without V2G causes fewer power system violations, while price optimized charging with V2G produces more power system violations compared with direct charging when using regional price signals for controlling V2G.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Price optimized charging strategies (with or without V2G) have a larger share of low-voltage grid cells with an improvement or no change (55-80%), and fewer low-voltage grid cells with an increase in urban areas than in city areas.

    “The price optimized charging strategies (with or without V2G) have a larger share of low-voltage grid cells with an improvement or no change (55-80%), and fewer low-voltage grid cells with an increase in urban areas than in city areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In urban areas, the median improvement is larger than the deterioration (between 2 and 3% units), and the distribution of improvement is larger.

    “In urban areas, the opposite is observed, e.g. the median improvement is larger than the deterioration (between 2 and 3% units), and the distribution of improvement is larger.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Direct charging has, on average, a lower coincidence factor with other EV charging events, but a higher coincidence factor with non-EV residential load.

    “Direct charging has, on average, a lower coincidence factor with other EV charging events, but a higher coincidence factor with non-EV residential load.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are large variations due to which price area was considered, with price optimized charging being preferable in SE4, SE3 and SE2 to various degrees, and direct charging being preferable in SE1.

    “We also found large variations due to which price area was considered, with price optimized charging being preferable in SE4, SE3 and SE2 to various degrees, and direct charging being preferable in SE1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In urban areas, both the number of low-voltage grid cells and difference in power system violations shows improvement for the price optimized charging strategies.

    “In urban areas, both the number of low-voltage grid cells (Fig. 6) and difference in power system violations (Fig. 7) shows improvement for the price optimized charging strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For price optimized charging with V2G, deterioration occurs in the same number of low-voltage grid cells as improvement for city areas, but the deterioration is larger than the improvement.

    “We observe that for price optimized charging with V2G deterioration occur in the same number of low-voltage grid cells as improvement for city areas (Fig. 6), but that the deterioration is larger than the improvement (Fig. 7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In SE1, price optimized charging produces fewer power system violations in 20% of the low-voltage grid cells, while in SE2 the share is 99%.

    “In SE1, price optimized charging produces fewer power system violations in 20% of the low-voltage grid cells, while in SE2 the share is 99%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The impact on low-voltage grids significantly depends on the combinations of driving patterns and electricity usage in the household, but the use of price optimized charging strategies slightly reduces this variation.

    “Lastly, we also found that the impact on low-voltage grids significantly depends on the combinations of driving patterns and electricity usage in the household, but that the use of price optimized charging strategies slightly reduces this variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Studies limited to single or few distribution grids will only capture certain variations and should be complemented with methods that include national or regional variation in low-voltage grids.

    “Studies limited to single or few distribution grids will therefore only capture certain variations, and should therefore be complemented with methods that include the national or regional variation in low-voltage grids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Direct charging is preferable in the far north while price optimized charging is preferable in the far south.

    “Direct charging is preferable in the far north while price optimized charging is preferable in the far south.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To achieve global and European climate targets limiting global warming to 1.5-2°C, the road transport sector needs to reduce its CO2 emissions.

    “To achieve global and European climate targets limiting global warming to 1.5-2 • Celsius, the road transport sector needs to reduce its CO 2 emissions [2,3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [3] 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a lack of knowledge of where grid violations will occur and how these locations are impacted by different charging strategies.

    “There is therefore a lack of knowledge of where grid violations will occur, and how these locations are impacted by different charging strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The bootstrap estimate will converge to the real estimate for an increasing number of resamples.

    “The bootstrap estimate will converge to the real estimate for an increasing number of resamples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The larger grid capacity per household in urban areas compared to city areas is likely due to a larger share of single-family houses and a lower coincidence factor resulting from lower customer density.

    “This is likely due to larger grid capacity per household in the urban areas compared to city areas.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Urban · hedged
      “The larger grid capacity is partly due to a larger share of singlefamily houses, and due to a lower coincidence factor which is a result of a lower customer density.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In previous literature, there are no national assessments of impacts of EV charging strategies on low-voltage electricity distribution, nor any analysis of how these impacts change with geographical location.

    “However, in previous literature, there are no national assessments of impacts of EV charging strategies on the low-voltage electricity distribution, nor any analysis how these impacts change with geographical location.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Passenger vehicles correspond to roughly 90% of all vehicles in Sweden.

    “The largest group of vehicles in most countries are passenger vehicles, which corresponds to roughly 90% of all vehicles in Sweden [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Statistics Sweden. (n.d.). Fordonsbestånd 2001–2020. Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/transporter-och-kommunikationer/vagtrafik/fordon/pong/tabell-och-diagram/fordonsbestand/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the model excludes the supplying medium voltage grid, a more conservative upper voltage limit of 5% is used in the low-voltage grids.

    “Since our model excludes the supplying medium voltage grid, we use a more conservative upper limit of 5% in the low-voltage grids.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The exclusion of non-residential load is likely to cause the model to overestimate grid impacts in areas with a significant non-residential load.

    “The exclusion of non-residential load is likely to cause the model to overestimate grid impacts in areas with a significant non-residential load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Low-voltage grids for commercial and industrial services are connected at separate transformers.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in results could also be due to the use of charging locations.

    “Differences in results could also be due to the use of charging locations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reduced risk is mainly explained by the large grid capacity for each customer, partly due to low customer density, power system component and requirements on tripping times.

    “The reduced risk is mainly explained by the large grid capacity for each customer, partly due to low customer density, power system component and requirements on tripping times.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cost-minimization sizing process causes a lower capacity margin in densely populated areas, which becomes especially apparent in very sparse areas with only a few customers per low-voltage transformer.

    “This causes a lower capacity margin in densely populated areas, which becomes especially apparent in very sparse areas with only a few customers per low-voltage transformer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The higher production variations lead more EVs to charge during hours of high electricity production, which leads to a high coincidence between charging events.

    “The higher production variations lead more EVs to charge during hours of high electricity production, which leads to a high coincidence between charging events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Our analysis has not included whether some of these combinations are more realistic than others.

    “Our analysis has not included whether some of these combinations are more realistic than others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If vehicles are used for commuting, this can cause charging to occur less frequently at the home location.

    “If vehicles are used for commuting, this can cause charging to occur less frequently at the home location.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Luthander et al. [16] found that EV charging did reduce the voltage below -5% during winter.

    “Luthander et al. [16], who studied the distribution grid in Herrljunga, Sweden, found that EV charging did reduce the voltage below -5% during winter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Luthander, 2019, Photovoltaics and opportunistic electric vehicle charging in the power system – a case study on a Swedish distribution grid, IET Renew Power Gener source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using regional price signals only would likely reduce the local benefit of V2G but maximize benefits for the electricity system.

    “Using regional price signals only would likely reduce the local benefit of V2G but maximize benefits for the electricity system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In countries with a different electricity mix, such as a system dominated by solar power, the price-optimized charging strategy is likely to allocate the charging to hours with high output from solar power (e.g., middle of the day).

    “In countries with a different electricity mix, such as a system dominated by solar power, instead of a mix of wind and hydro power as in Sweden, the priceoptimized charging strategy is likely to allocate the charging to hours with high output from solar power (e.g., middle of the day).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies have found reductions in grid violation from V2G [10], but have used other control signals, such as voltage and frequency.

    “Previous studies have found reductions in grid violation from V2G [10], but have used other control signals, such as voltage and frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Habib, 2015, Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks – a review, J Power Sources source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The coincidence between EV charging and household demand is higher for direct charging but lower for price optimized charging.

    “The coincidence between EV charging and household demand is therefore higher for direct charging but lower for price optimized charging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This might indirectly increase the probability of power system violations.

    “This might indirectly increase the probability of power system violations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Solar-dominated systems tend also to rely on more V2G to balance the grid due to intraday fluctuations.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These differences would impact the probability for limitation due to voltage variations.

    “These differences would impact the probability for limitation due to voltage variations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Steen et al. found that the grid could handle 50%-100% of EV integration without grid issues.

    “Steen et al., who analyzed low-voltage grids in Gothenburg, found that the grid could handle 50%-100% of EV integration without grid issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steen et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    According to Steen et al., thermal capacity constraints were the main limiting factor.

    “According to Steen et al. thermal capacity constraints were the main limiting factor”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steen et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    It is not evident that a high share of solar PV and reduced home charging would lead to increased power system violations.

    “It is not evident that a high share of solar PV and reduced home charging would lead to increased power system violations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In areas with a high share of commercial electricity usage, our model would likely overestimate the power system violations, which can explain why our results are more conservative than previous case studies.

    “In areas with a high share of commercial electricity usage, our model would likely overestimate the power system violations, which can explain why our results are more conservative than previous case studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
42 of 42
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All passenger vehicles are electrified in the scenario.

    “we assume a scenario where all passenger vehicles are electrified.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Low-voltage grids for commercial and industrial services are connected at separate transformers.

    “The reference network model includes residential customers and assume that low-voltage grids for commercial and industrial services are connected at separate transformers.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each household has a low-voltage grid connection.

    “We assume that each household has a low-voltage grid connection.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Individual driving patterns will not change during a large-scale EV adoption.

    “Since the measurements were done on combustion vehicles, we assume that individual driving patterns will not change during a large-scale EV adoption.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are no known datasets that have quality data for both household electricity demand and measured driving demand.

    “The household load profiles and charging profiles originate from independent and separate measurement campaigns, i.e., there are no known datasets that have quality data for both household electricity demand as well as measured driving demand.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of data regarding electricity load profile and charging profile from the same households.

    “There is a lack of data regarding electricity load profile and charging profile from the same households.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The three charging strategies used in this study were modeled assuming an electricity system without fossil fuels and with a full-scale deployment of EVs (i.e., all passenger vehicles are assumed to be EVs), which add a new household load.

    “The three charging strategies used in this study were modeled assuming an electricity system without fossil fuels and with a full-scale deployment of EVs (i.e., all passenger vehicles are assumed to be EVs), which add a new household load.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    This study assumes only home charging.

    “This study assumes only home charging, while Steen et al. used home and work charging.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The reference network model used to design the grids relies on several assumptions, such as average fuse size, geographical distribution of customers and exclusion of non-residential demand.

    “The reference network model used to design the grids relies on several assumptions, such as average fuse size, geographical distribution of customers and exclusion of non-residential demand.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The share of wind power in SE3 is 82%, and 57% in SE4.

    “The share of wind power in SE3 is 82%, and 57% in SE4.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The conditions for electricity production vary significantly between the price areas.

    “The conditions for electricity production vary significantly between the price areas.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SE1 has a significant amount of hydropower, while SE2, and to some extent SE1, have significant levels of wind production.

    “SE1 has a significant amount of hydropower, while SE2, and to some extent SE1, have significant levels of wind production.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Solar-dominated systems tend also to rely on more V2G to balance the grid due to intraday fluctuations.

    “Furthermore, solar-dominated systems tend also to rely on more V2G to balance the grid due to intraday fluctuations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Herrljunga low-voltage grids are mostly classified as rural according to our definition, with central Herrljunga classified as urban.

    “The Herrljunga low-voltage grids are mostly classified as rural according to our definition, with central Herrljunga classified as urban.”
14 of 14

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Driving-data citation [31] points to a census source

    Minor

    The methods cite [31] for GPS-tracked vehicles, but reference 31 is a Eurostat census entry.

  • Figure A1 is described as two different maps

    Minor

    The results identify Figure A1 as a map of the demographic classification, but its caption identifies it as vehicle-ownership data.

  • Conflicting accounts of voltage violations in the Luthander study

    Minor

    The introduction says the grids in that study experienced no voltage issues after EV charging was added, while the discussion says charging reduced voltage below −5%.

  • Electricity-model citation [39] points to household-size data

    Minor

    The methods attribute the charging profiles to modeling by Taljegard et al. [39], but reference 39 is a Statistics Sweden household-size source.

  • Net-load profile changes symbols between definition and use

    Minor

    Equation (5) defines the net-load profile as P J, but the subsequent description calls it P HH, which was defined as the average residential load profile.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartvigsson, E., Taljegard, M., Odenberger, M., & Chen, P.
Corresponding author
Hartvigsson, Elias
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
261
Pages
125180
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292755995
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, low-voltage distribution networks, home charging, charging strategies, direct charging, residential areas, urban-rural differences, distribution system operators, renewable energy systems, electric mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review