Cited by 184Climate Change Policy and EconomicsRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsSustainability and Climate Change Governance

An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020

Open access
Li, Lili, Taeihagh, Araz·2020·Applied Energy

Abstract

Global warming and the acute domestic air pollution in China have necessitated transition to a sustainable energy system away from coal-dominated energy production. Through a systematic review of the national policy documents, this study investigates the policy mix adopted by the Chinese government to facilitate its energy transition and how that policy mix has evolved between 1981 and 2020. The chronological analysis emphasizes two dimensions of temporal changes in the policy mix: (1) changes in the policy intensity and density, and (2) the shift in policy instrument combinations. The policy mix has evolved from a few authority-based instruments to the current response that has a large density of instruments with a good diversity of instrument types. The Chinese government imposes an increasing policy intensity on air pollution abatement and a decreasing policy intensity on renewable energy support, and experiments with innovative policy instruments to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The evolutionary trajectory features layering new policy instruments, calibrating existing ones and some degree of policy replacement and sequencing. Overall, the study shows that the Chinese government has adopted a complex mix of policy instruments to abate emissions (e.g. carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide) in the coal-based energy system and to support renewable energy technologies. The study provides an in-depth understanding of Chinese policy design in the environment and energy fields and contributes to the public policy literature by filling a research gap – the comparative lack of empirical analyses on the temporal changes in the policy mixes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114611

Cites

95 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Streeck W, Thelen K. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In: Streeck W, Thelen K, editors. Beyond Contin. Institutional Chang. Adv. Polit. Econ., Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005, p. 1-39.
  2. Knill C, Schulze K, Tosun J. Measuring environmental policy change: Conceptual alternatives and research implications vol. 125. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien (Institute for Advanced Studies); 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., & Taeihagh, A.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Taeihagh, Araz
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
263
Pages
114611
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005896759
Cited by
184
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore
  • Ministry of Water Resources
  • Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Taiwan
  • National Development and Reform Commission
  • Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
policy mix, energy transition, sustainable energy policy, China, policy instruments, policy intensity, policy evolution, air pollution abatement, CO2 emissions, sulfur dioxide emissions, renewable energy support, policy sequencing, environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review