Cited by 57Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Application of energy and CO2 reduction assessments for end-of-life vehicles recycling in Japan

Sato, Fernando Enzo Kenta, Furubayashi, Takaaki, Nakata, Toshihiko·2019·Applied Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.002

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, F. E. K., Furubayashi, T., & Nakata, T.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakata, Toshihiko
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
237
Pages
779-794
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911074241
Cited by
57
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16KT0036)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
end-of-life vehicles, vehicle recycling, energy consumption reduction, CO2 reduction, vehicle life cycle, material flow analysis, material values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review