The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid
Open accessAbstract
Peer-to-peer trading in energy networks is expected to be exclusively conducted by the prosumers of the network with negligible influence from the grid. This raises the critical question: how can enough prosumers be encouraged to participate in peer-to-peer trading so as to make its operation sustainable and beneficial to the overall electricity network? To this end, this paper proposes how a motivational psychology framework can be used effectively to design peer-to-peer energy trading to increase user participation. To do so, first, the state-of-the-art of peer-to-peer energy trading literature is discussed by following a systematic classification, and gaps in existing studies are identified. Second, a motivation psychology framework is introduced, which consists of a number of motivational models that a prosumer needs to satisfy before being convinced to participate in energy trading. Third, a game-theoretic peer-to-peer energy trading scheme is developed, its relevant properties are studied, and it is shown that the coalition among different prosumers is a stable coalition. Fourth, through numerical case studies, it is shown that the proposed model can reduce carbon emissions by 18.38% and 9.82% in a single day in Summer and Winter respectively compared to a feed-in-tariff scheme. The proposed scheme is also shown to reduce the cost of energy up to 118 ¢ and 87 ¢ per day in Summer and Winter respectively. Finally, how the outcomes of the scheme satisfy all the motivational psychology models is discussed, which subsequently shows its potential to attract users to participate in energy trading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002) · Cited by 7,000
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2016) · Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 4,993
Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory
(1982) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)x6169-7 · Cited by 4,057
Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604 · Cited by 2,336
Designing microgrid energy markets
Mengelkamp, E., Gärttner, J., Rock, K., Kessler, S., Orsini, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.054 · Cited by 1,578
Kang, J., Yu, R., Huang, X., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y., & Hossain, E. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2709784 · Cited by 1,139
Coalitional game theory for communication networks
Saad, W., Han, Z., Debbah, M., Hjorungnes, A., & Basar, T. (2009) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2009.000000 · Cited by 1,051
Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review
Sousa, T., Soares, T., Pinson, P., Moret, F., Baroche, T., & Sorin, E. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.036 · Cited by 936
Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid
Zhang, C., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., Cheng, M., & Long, C. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.010 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Tushar, W., Yuen, C., Saha, T. K., Morstyn, T., Chapman, A. C., Alam, M. J. E., Hanif, S., & Poor, H. V. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116131 · Cited by 523
Self-citationA novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology
Esmat, A., de Vos, M., Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Y., Palensky, P., & Epema, D. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116123 · Cited by 420
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence Capabilities to Improve Cybersecurity
Zeadally, S., Adi, E., Baig, Z., & Khan, I. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968045 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Tushar, W., Saha, T. K., Yuen, C., Morstyn, T., McCulloch, M. D., Poor, H. V., & Wood, K. L.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 243
- Pages
- 10-20
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921445803
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 17.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.111
- The paper
- Tushar, W., Saha, T. K., Yuen, C., Morstyn, T., McCulloch, M. D., Poor, H. V., & Wood, K. L. (2019). A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.