The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hybrid statistical data-driven method for on-line joint state estimation of lithium-ion batteries
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries are increasingly being used as the energy storage systems in electric vehicles, smart grid and aerospace systems. Estimating the state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion battery is essential to the operational safety and reliability of a system. However, some useful battery parameters, such as capacity and impedance, are not easy to measure because of the complex testing procedure and conditions. This makes the on-line state-of-health estimation suffer from low accuracy and further impacts the estimation accuracy of state-of-charge. This paper proposes a joint lithium-ion battery state estimation approach that takes advantage of the data-driven least-square-support-vector-machine and model-based unscented-particle-filter. The indicator of battery performance degradation is extracted for state-of-health estimation based on the measurable terminal voltage and electric current. Then, the least-square-support-vector-machine is implemented to provide direct and nonlinear mapping models for state-of-health and state-of-charge. These direct mapping models avoid parameter identification and updating, which are applicable in cases with complex operating conditions. Unscented-particle-filter is utilized to take the least-square-support-vector-machine estimates as the temporal measurements for optimal state-of-health and state-of-charge estimation. The state-of-health correction in state-of-charge estimation achieves the joint estimation with different time scales. An experimental study on battery dynamic stress tests illustrates that the life cycle maximum state-of-charge estimation error is less than 2% and the root-mean-square-error of state-of-health estimation is less than 4%, which mean both state-of-charge and state-of-health can be estimated with high accuracy and robustness using the proposed hybrid joint state estimation method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles
Lu, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J., & Ouyang, M. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 · Cited by 4,837
Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation
Severson, K. A., Attia, P. M., Jin, N., Perkins, N., Jiang, B., Yang, Z., Chen, M. H., Aykol, M., Herring, P. K., Fraggedakis, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8 · Cited by 3,228
Hannan, M. A., Lipu, M. S. H., Hussain, A., & Mohamed, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001 · Cited by 2,005
Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles
Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2780258 · Cited by 1,004
Battery-Management System (BMS) and SOC Development for Electrical Vehicles
Cheng, K. W. E., Divakar, B. P., Wu, H., Ding, K., & Ho, H. F. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2010.2089647 · Cited by 692
Li, J., Adewuyi, K., Lotfi, N., Landers, R. G., & Park, J. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.011 · Cited by 623
Technological Developments in Batteries: A Survey of Principal Roles, Types, and Management Needs
Hu, X., Zou, C., Zhang, C., & Li, Y. (2017) · IEEE Power and Energy Magazine · doi:10.1109/mpe.2017.2708812 · Cited by 561
Hu, C., Youn, B. D., & Chung, J. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.002 · Cited by 560
Shen, P., Ouyang, M., Lu, L., Li, J., & Feng, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2751613 · Cited by 534
Hu, X., Jiang, J., Cao, D., & Egardt, B. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2461523 · Cited by 504
Cited by
Wang, Y., Tian, J., Sun, Z., Wang, L., Xu, R., Li, M., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110015 · Cited by 1,377
Wang, S., Fan, Y., Jin, S., Takyi-Aninakwa, P., & Fernandez, C. (2023) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108920 · Cited by 554
Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?
Lombardo, T., Duquesnoy, M., El-Bouysidy, H., Årén, F., Gallo-Bueno, A., Jørgensen, P. B., Bhowmik, A., Demortière, A., Ayerbe, E., Alcaide, F., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 · Cited by 503
Wang, Z., Feng, G., Zhen, D., Gu, F., & Ball, A. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.113 · Cited by 441
Sui, X., He, S., Vilsen, S. B., Meng, J., Teodorescu, R., & Stroe, D.-I. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, Y., Liu, D., Liao, H., & Peng, Y.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 114408
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2999725011
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hybrid statistical data-driven method for on-line joint state estimation of lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114408
- The paper
- Song, Y., Liu, D., Liao, H., & Peng, Y. (2020). A hybrid statistical data-driven method for on-line joint state estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.