Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,004

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles

Open access
Xiong, Rui, Cao, Jiayi, Yu, Quanqing, He, Hongwen, Sun, Fengchun·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

Battery technology is the bottleneck of the electric vehicles (EVs). It is important, both in theory and practical application, to do research on the modeling and state estimation of batteries, which is essential to optimizing energy management, extending the life cycle, reducing cost, and safeguarding the safe application of batteries in EVs. However, the batteries, with strong time-variables and nonlinear characteristics, are further influenced by such random factors such as driving loads, operational conditions, in the application of EVs. The real-time, accurate estimation of their state is challenging. The classification of the estimation methodologies for estimating state-of-charge (SoC) of battery focusing with the estimation method/algorithm, advantages, drawbacks, and estimation error are systematically and separately discussed. Especially for the battery packs existing of the inevitable inconsistency in cell capacity, resistance and voltage, the advanced characterizing monomer selection, and bias correction-based method has been described and discussed. The review also presents the key feedback factors that are indispensable for accurate estimation of battery SoC, it will be helpful for ensuring the SoC estimation accuracy. It will be very helpful for choosing an appropriate method to develop a reliable and safe battery management system and energy management strategy of the EVs. Finally, the paper also highlights a number of key factors and challenges, and presents the possible recommendations for the development of next generation of smart SoC estimation and battery management systems for electric vehicles and battery energy storage system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2017.2780258

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315020 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315020 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/CCA.2008.4629589 · DOI
  4. 10.1149/2.098206jes · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.029 · DOI · Paper page
  6. kim, 2008, Nonlinear state of charge estimator for hybrid electric vehicle battery, IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23, 2027, 10.1109/TPEL.2008.924629 · DOI · Paper page
  7. fang, 2013, Adaptive estimation of state of charge for lithium-ion batteries, Proc Amer Control Conf (ACC), 3485
  8. li, 2013, State-of-charge (SoC) estimation based on a reduced order electrochemical thermal model and extended Kalman filter, Proc Amer Control Conf, 1100
  9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.089 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/TIE.2011.2159691 · DOI · Paper page
  12. pop, 2008, Battery Management Systems Accurate State-of-Charge Indication for Battery-Powered Applications, 9
  13. 10.1016/j.simpat.2013.01.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00351-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3390/en3091586 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.103 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.039 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3390/en3020206 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1149/1.1847658 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10800-007-9291-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.036 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.078 · DOI
  28. 10.1115/1.4024801 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3390/en5051455 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TTE.2015.2512237 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2403796 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.04.146 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2235951 · DOI
  34. doyle, 1890, Comparison of modeling predictions with experimental data from plastic lithium ion cells, J Electrochem Soc, 143
  35. 10.1109/TCST.2009.2027023 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.070 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.072 · DOI · Paper page
  38. scott moura, 2012, Adaptive PDE observer for battery SoC/SOH estimation, Proc 5th Annu Dyn Syst Control Conf Joint JSME 11th Motion Vibrat Conf, 101
  39. 10.1115/1.4002475 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1002/er.1655 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/eej.22511 · DOI
  42. 10.1155/2014/348537 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s12239-014-0010-1 · doi:10.1007/s12239-014-0010-1
  44. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.051 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.061 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.095 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.027 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.094 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1109/TIM.2009.2013927 · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2013927
  51. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.3390/en4040582 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1080/15435075.2014.891512 · DOI
  54. 10.1109/TVT.2012.2222684 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.076 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1109/TVT.2004.842461 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.143 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1109/MPE.2017.2708812 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1007/s10098-013-0588-4 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.065 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.119 · DOI
  62. 10.1109/I2MTC.2012.6229280 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.116 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.075 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1109/TIE.2010.2043035 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.071 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.158 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.183 · DOI
  69. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2725301 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1109/TII.2013.2284713 · DOI
  71. 10.21236/AD0406134 · doi:10.21236/ad0406134
  72. 10.1016/0002-9149(65)90056-1 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00079-8 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2009.00650 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.038 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00078-4 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.124 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.039 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/S0097-8485(00)00099-1 · doi:10.1016/s0097-8485(00)00099-1
  82. 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.12.015 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00502-9 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.013 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
1832-1843
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774327138
Cited by
1,004
References
13
FWCI
48.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51507012)
  • Beijing Nova Program (Z171100001117063)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2780258
The paper
Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F. (2018). Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2780258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.