The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Battery technology is the bottleneck of the electric vehicles (EVs). It is important, both in theory and practical application, to do research on the modeling and state estimation of batteries, which is essential to optimizing energy management, extending the life cycle, reducing cost, and safeguarding the safe application of batteries in EVs. However, the batteries, with strong time-variables and nonlinear characteristics, are further influenced by such random factors such as driving loads, operational conditions, in the application of EVs. The real-time, accurate estimation of their state is challenging. The classification of the estimation methodologies for estimating state-of-charge (SoC) of battery focusing with the estimation method/algorithm, advantages, drawbacks, and estimation error are systematically and separately discussed. Especially for the battery packs existing of the inevitable inconsistency in cell capacity, resistance and voltage, the advanced characterizing monomer selection, and bias correction-based method has been described and discussed. The review also presents the key feedback factors that are indispensable for accurate estimation of battery SoC, it will be helpful for ensuring the SoC estimation accuracy. It will be very helpful for choosing an appropriate method to develop a reliable and safe battery management system and energy management strategy of the EVs. Finally, the paper also highlights a number of key factors and challenges, and presents the possible recommendations for the development of next generation of smart SoC estimation and battery management systems for electric vehicles and battery energy storage system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles
Lu, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J., & Ouyang, M. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 · Cited by 4,837
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328 · cited 1×
“proposed a P2D electrochemical model on the basis of its physical process [46], [47].”
BackgroundExtended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs
Plett, G. L. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.033 · Cited by 1,768
Waag, W., Käbitz, S., & Sauer, D. U. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.030 · Cited by 987 · cited 1×
“4 to estimate the SoC of battery in real-time [51], [78]–[80].”
BackgroundSun, F., Hu, X., Zou, Y., & Li, S. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.059 · Cited by 614
Self-citationBattery management systems in electric and hybrid vehicles
Xing, Y., Ma, E. W. M., Tsui, K. L., & Pecht, M. (2011) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en4111840 · Cited by 540
The State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on a Proportional-Integral Observer
Xu, J., Mi, C. C., Cao, B., Deng, J., Chen, Z., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2013.2287375 · Cited by 367
The novel state of charge estimation method for lithium battery using sliding mode observer
Kim, I.-S. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.006 · Cited by 359
Xiong, R., Yu, Q., Wang, L. Y., & Lin, C. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.136 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 85
- 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315020 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACC.2012.6315020 · DOI
- 10.1109/CCA.2008.4629589 · DOI
- 10.1149/2.098206jes · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.029 · DOI · Paper page
- kim, 2008, Nonlinear state of charge estimator for hybrid electric vehicle battery, IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23, 2027, 10.1109/TPEL.2008.924629 · DOI · Paper page
- fang, 2013, Adaptive estimation of state of charge for lithium-ion batteries, Proc Amer Control Conf (ACC), 3485
- li, 2013, State-of-charge (SoC) estimation based on a reduced order electrochemical thermal model and extended Kalman filter, Proc Amer Control Conf, 1100
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIE.2011.2159691 · DOI · Paper page
- pop, 2008, Battery Management Systems Accurate State-of-Charge Indication for Battery-Powered Applications, 9
- 10.1016/j.simpat.2013.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00351-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/en3091586 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/en3020206 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1149/1.1847658 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10800-007-9291-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.078 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.4024801 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/en5051455 · DOI
- 10.1109/TTE.2015.2512237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIE.2015.2403796 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.04.146 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2235951 · DOI
- doyle, 1890, Comparison of modeling predictions with experimental data from plastic lithium ion cells, J Electrochem Soc, 143
- 10.1109/TCST.2009.2027023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.072 · DOI · Paper page
- scott moura, 2012, Adaptive PDE observer for battery SoC/SOH estimation, Proc 5th Annu Dyn Syst Control Conf Joint JSME 11th Motion Vibrat Conf, 101
- 10.1115/1.4002475 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/er.1655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eej.22511 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/348537 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12239-014-0010-1 · doi:10.1007/s12239-014-0010-1
- 10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.095 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.094 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIM.2009.2013927 · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2013927
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/en4040582 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15435075.2014.891512 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2012.2222684 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TVT.2004.842461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/MPE.2017.2708812 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10098-013-0588-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.119 · DOI
- 10.1109/I2MTC.2012.6229280 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.075 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIE.2010.2043035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.071 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.158 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.183 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2725301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TII.2013.2284713 · DOI
- 10.21236/AD0406134 · doi:10.21236/ad0406134
- 10.1016/0002-9149(65)90056-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00079-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2009.00650 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.038 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00078-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0097-8485(00)00099-1 · doi:10.1016/s0097-8485(00)00099-1
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.12.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00502-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.013 · DOI
Cited by
Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review
Li, Y., Liu, K., Foley, A. M., Zülke, A., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Van Mierlo, J., & Hoster, H. E. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109254 · Cited by 1,193
Xiong, R., Li, L., & Tian, J. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.019 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationPredicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven machine learning
Ng, M.-F., Zhao, J., Yan, Q., Conduit, G. J., & Seh, Z. W. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0156-7 · Cited by 793
Shrivastava, P., Soon, T. K., Idris, M. Y. I. B., & Mekhilef, S. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.040 · Cited by 704
Global Trends in High-Power On-Board Chargers for Electric Vehicles
Khaligh, A., & D'Antonio, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2897050 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1832-1843
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774327138
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 48.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51507012)
- Beijing Nova Program (Z171100001117063)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2780258
- The paper
- Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F. (2018). Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2780258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.