The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Building thermal load prediction informs the optimization of cooling plant and thermal energy storage. Physics-based prediction models of building thermal load are constrained by the model and input complexity. In this study, we developed 12 data-driven models (7 shallow learning, 2 deep learning, and 3 heuristic methods) to predict building thermal load and compared shallow machine learning and deep learning. The 12 prediction models were compared with the measured cooling demand. It was found XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boost) and LSTM (Long Short Term Memory) provided the most accurate load prediction in the shallow and deep learning category, and both outperformed the best baseline model, which uses the previous day’s data for prediction. Then, we discussed how the prediction horizon and input uncertainty would influence the load prediction accuracy. Major conclusions are twofold: first, LSTM performs well in short-term prediction (1 h ahead) but not in long term prediction (24 h ahead), because the sequential information becomes less relevant and accordingly not so useful when the prediction horizon is long. Second, the presence of weather forecast uncertainty deteriorates XGBoost’s accuracy and favors LSTM, because the sequential information makes the model more robust to input uncertainty. Training the model with the uncertain rather than accurate weather data could enhance the model’s robustness. Our findings have two implications for practice. First, LSTM is recommended for short-term load prediction given that weather forecast uncertainty is unavoidable. Second, XGBoost is recommended for long term prediction, and the model should be trained with the presence of input uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples)
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333709 · Cited by 23,469
Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729437 · Cited by 3,542
A review on the prediction of building energy consumption
Zhao, H.-X., & Magoulès, F. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.049 · Cited by 1,937
A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies
Amasyali, K., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.095 · Cited by 1,874
Chollet, F. (2017) · Cited by 1,158
Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Cabeza, L. F., Serrano, S., Barreneche, C., & Petrichenko, K. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.039 · Cited by 1,089
Cited by
Deep learning models for solar irradiance forecasting: A comprehensive review
Kumari, P., & Toshniwal, D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128566 · Cited by 445
Physical energy and data-driven models in building energy prediction: A review
Chen, Y., Guo, M., Chen, Z., Chen, Z., & Ji, Y. (2022) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.162 · Cited by 384
Khalil, M., McGough, A. S., Pourmirza, Z., Pazhoohesh, M., & Walker, S. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287 · Cited by 299
Zhang, C., Li, J., Zhao, Y., Li, T., Chen, Q., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110301 · Cited by 124
Prediction of Heat and Cold Loads of Factory Mushroom Houses Based on EWT Decomposition
Zuo, H., Zheng, W., Wang, M., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152115270 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Hong, T., & Piette, M. A.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 263
- Pages
- 114683
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008571545
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 29.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Hong, T., & Piette, M. A. (2020). Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.