Cited by 29Sleep and related disordersPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces: a pilot study

Vaughn McCall, W., Boggs, Niki, Letton, Alan·2012·Applied Ergonomics

Abstract

Six married couples (12 adults, mean age 34.8 years) were randomized as couples in a cross-over design to sleep on a queen-size conventional mattress for 2 weeks and a specially-designed pressure-relief mattress for 2 weeks. The pressure-relief mattress was designed to reduce the number of contact points exceeding 30 mm Hg. Actigraphic measurements of sleep and self-reports of sleep and daytime symptoms were collected at baseline for 2 weeks on each couple's home mattress and box springs at home, followed by 2 weeks of data collection on each randomized mattress for a total of 6 weeks of data collection. Pressure maps were created for each participant on each sleeping surface. There were no significant differences between the randomized sleeping surfaces for any measure of actigraphic sleep or self-reported sleep and daytime symptoms. However, poor pressure relief performance of the home mattress was associated with better actigraphic sleep on the randomized pressure-relief mattress. We conclude that while pressure-relief mattresses may not be universally preferred, baseline characteristics of the sleeper and/or their mattress may explain performance and sleeper preferences on future mattress selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.012

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An uncomfortable sleeping environment may reduce sleep ability.

    “Although data on beds and other sleeping surfaces are relatively scarce, an uncomfortable sleeping environment may also reduce sleep ability.237–239”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [237]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn McCall, W., Boggs, N., & Letton, A.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Applied Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
386-391
ISSN
0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999756985
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2012-05-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
pressure distribution, actigraphy, sleep quality, daytime symptoms, pressure maps
MeSH terms
Adult, Beds, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Pressure, Sleep, Cross-Over Studies, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review