Cited by 28Geographic Information Systems StudiesGeography and Environmental StudiesUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cost path and network analysis methodology to calculate distances along a complex river network in the Peruvian Amazon

Webster, K., Arroyo-Mora, J.P., Coomes, O.T., Takasaki, Y., Abizaid, C.·2016·Applied Geography

Abstract

Distance is a key variable in explicating environmental, social, and economic conditions and in defining spatial and temporal patterns. Prior research has primarily focused on using simple to complex algorithms for calculating distances along road networks. In contrast, few algorithms are available for distance calculations along fluvial networks which are often more erratic, divergent and transient than road networks. Fluvial transportation is relied upon worldwide, particularly in developing regions, where communities use river networks for transportation, access to natural resources and for trade and commerce. This paper presents a methodology developed for mapping complex fluvial networks for travel distance analysis. The methodology was applied in four major river basins in western Amazonia over some 35,000 km of river length and incorporating 919 communities as origins/destinations. A cost path and network analysis methodology was created using vector and raster datasets in a Geographic Information System (GIS) to assess interactions among communities and the distances traveled by river to reach district capitals, major urban centres and marketplaces. An accuracy assessment using distance values calculated from a previous study using a different methodological approach in the region as well as Google Earth Pro, found a high degree of concordance for distance calculations. Our methodology creates a very flexible approach for complex river systems that can be use to calculate river distances in an adaptive and efficient manner and that can be use in other regions of the world where rural communities must rely on rivers for transportation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.05.008

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Webster, K., Arroyo-Mora, J. P., Coomes, O. T., Takasaki, Y., & Abizaid, C.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Applied Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
73
Pages
13-25
ISSN
0143-6228 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410071568
Cited by
28
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Geography (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • University of Toronto
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Geography and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
network analysis, Peruvian Amazon, river basins, market access, riverine communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review