Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lateral Balance Factors Predict Future Falls in Community-Living Older Adults

Open access
Hilliard, Marjorie Johnson, Martinez, Katherine M., Janssen, Imke, Edwards, Beatrice, Mille, Marie-Laure, Zhang, Yunhui, Rogers, Mark W.·2008·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To prospectively determine the capacity of measures of mediolateral (ML) protective stepping performance, maximum hip abduction torque, and trunk mobility, in order to predict the risk of falls among community-living older people. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting A balance and falls research laboratory. Participants Medically screened and functionally independent community-living older adult volunteers (N=51). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Measures included: (1) protective stepping responses: percentage of trials with multiple balance recovery steps and sidestep/crossover step recovery patterns, and first step length following motor-driven waist-pull perturbations of ML standing balance; (2) hip abduction strength and axial mobility: (3) peak isokinetic hip abduction joint torque and trunk functional axial rotation (FAR) range of motion; and (4) fall incidence: monthly mail-in reporting of fall occurrences with follow-up contact for 1 year post-testing. One- and 2-variable logistic regression analysis models determined which single and combined measures optimally predicted fall status. Results The single variable model with the strongest predictive value for falls was the use of multiple steps in all trials (100% multiple steps) (odds ratio, 6.2; P=.005). Two-variable models, including 100% multiple steps and either hip abduction torque or FAR variables, significantly improved fall prediction over 100% multiple steps alone. The hip abduction and FAR logistic regression optimally predicted fall status. Conclusions The findings identify new predictor variables for risk of falling that underscore the importance of dynamic balance recovery performance through ML stepping in relation to neuromusculoskeletal factors contributing to lateral balance stability. The results also highlight focused risk factors for falling that are amenable to clinical interventions for enhancing lateral balance function and preventing falls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.023

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Hilliard, M. J., Martinez, K. M., Janssen, I., Edwards, B., Mille, M.-L., Zhang, Y., & Rogers, M. W.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
89
Issue
9
Pages
1708-1713
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113271768
Cited by
309
References
33
FWCI
22.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lateral Balance Factors Predict Future Falls in Community-Living Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.023
The paper
Hilliard, M. J., Martinez, K. M., Janssen, I., Edwards, B., Mille, M.-L., Zhang, Y., & Rogers, M. W. (2008). Lateral Balance Factors Predict Future Falls in Community-Living Older Adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.