Cited by 202Nutrition and Health in AgingBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPhysical Activity and Health

Systematic Review of High-Intensity Progressive Resistance Strength Training of the Lower Limb Compared With Other Intensities of Strength Training in Older Adults

Raymond, Melissa J., Bramley-Tzerefos, Rebecca E., Jeffs, Kimberley J., Winter, Adele, Holland, Anne E.·2013·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training (HIPRST) on strength, function, mood, quality of life, and adverse events compared with other intensities in older adults. Data sources Online databases were searched from their inception to July 2012. Study selection Randomized controlled trials of HIPRST of the lower limb compared with other intensities of progressive resistance strength training (PRST) in older adults (mean age ≥ 65y) were identified. Data extraction Two reviewers independently completed quality assessment using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and data extraction using a prepared checklist. Data synthesis Twenty-one trials were included. Study quality was fair to moderate (PEDro scale range, 3-7). Studies had small sample sizes (18-84), and participants were generally healthy. Meta-analyses revealed HIPRST improved lower-limb strength greater than moderate- and low-intensity PRST (standardized mean difference [SMD]=.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], .40 to 1.17 and SMD=.83; 95% CI, -.02 to 1.68, respectively). Studies where groups performed equivalent training volumes resulted in similar improvements in leg strength, regardless of training intensity. Similar improvements were found across intensities for functional performance and disability. The effect of intensity of PRST on mood was inconsistent across studies. Adverse events were poorly reported, however, no correlation was found between training intensity and severity of adverse events. Conclusions HIPRST improves lower-limb strength more than lesser training intensities, although it may not be required to improve functional performance. Training volume is also an important variable. HIPRST appears to be a safe mode of exercise in older adults. Further research into its effects on older adults with chronic health conditions across the care continuum is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.022

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raymond, M. J., Bramley-Tzerefos, R. E., Jeffs, K. J., Winter, A., & Holland, A. E.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Northern Health (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Raymond, Melissa J.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
1458-1472
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055185857
Cited by
202
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise intensity, older adults, lower limb strength, functional performance, disability, mood, quality of life, adverse events, training volume
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Humans, Physical Endurance, Quality of Life, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Recovery of Function, Lower Extremity, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review