Cited by 98Medical Practices and RehabilitationHospital Admissions and OutcomesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Functional Status Impairment Is Associated With Unplanned Readmissions

Open access
Hoyer, Erik H., Needham, Dale M., Miller, Jason, Deutschendorf, Amy, Friedman, Michael, Brotman, Daniel J.·2013·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To determine whether functional status on admission to a Comprehensive Integrated Inpatient Rehabilitation Program (CIIRP) is associated with unplanned readmission to acute care.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Academic hospital-based CIIRP.Participants Consecutive patients (N=1515) admitted to a CIIRP between January 2009 and June 2012.Interventions Patients' functional status, the primary exposure variable, was assessed using tertiles of the total FIM score at CIIRP admission, with secondary analyses using the FIM motor and cognitive domains. A propensity score, consisting of 25 relevant clinical and demographic variables, was used to adjust for confounding in the analysis.Main outcome measures Readmission to acute care was categorized as (1) readmission before planned discharge from the CIIRP, (2) readmission within 30 days of discharge from the CIIRP, and (3) total readmissions from both groups, with total readmissions being the a priori primary outcome.Results Among the 1515 patients, there were 347 total readmissions. Total readmissions were significantly associated with FIM scores, with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the lowest and middle FIM tertiles versus the highest tertile (AOR=2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.7; P<.001 and AOR=1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P=.002, respectively). There were similar findings for secondary analyses of readmission before planned discharge from the CIIRP (AOR=3.5; 95% CI, 2.2-5.8; P<.001 and AOR=2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5l P=.002, respectively), and a weaker association for readmissions after discharge from the CIIRP (AOR=1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P=.047 and AOR=1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9; P=.28, respectively). The FIM motor domain score was more strongly associated with readmissions than the FIM cognitive score.Conclusions Functional status on admission to the CIIRP is strongly associated with readmission to acute care, particularly for motor aspects of functional status and readmission before planned discharge from the CIIRP. Efforts to reduce hospital readmissions should consider patient functional status as an important and potentially modifiable risk factor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.028

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Carter G, Relles D, Buchanan J, A classification system for inpatient rehabilitation patients: a review and proposed revisions to the functional independence measure-function related groups. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Services Report No. PB98-105992; 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyer, E. H., Needham, D. M., Miller, J., Deutschendorf, A., Friedman, M., & Brotman, D. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoyer, Erik H.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
1951-1958
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970926870
Cited by
98
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (IC1-12-0001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
unplanned hospital readmission, functional status, Functional Independence Measure, motor function, cognitive function, hospital readmission, rehabilitation admission, propensity score adjustment, stroke rehabilitation, spinal cord injury rehabilitation, traumatic brain injury rehabilitation, multiple sclerosis rehabilitation, cerebral palsy rehabilitation, brain injury rehabilitation, chronic pain rehabilitation, psychiatric rehabilitation, drug rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review