Cited by 59Disability Education and EmploymentSpinal Cord Injury ResearchOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Effectiveness of Supported Employment for Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury: 2-Year Results

Ottomanelli, Lisa, Barnett, Scott D., Goetz, Lance L.·2014·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To examine if supported employment (SE) remains more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) in returning veterans to competitive employment after spinal cord injury (SCI) at 2-year follow-up.Design Prospective, randomized, controlled, multisite trial of SE versus TAU with 24 months of follow-up.Setting SCI centers.Participants Subjects (N=201) were enrolled and completed baseline interviews. At interventional sites, subjects were randomized to SE (n=81) or TAU (n=76). At observational sites, 44 subjects were enrolled in a nonrandomized TAU condition.Intervention The intervention was a SE program called the SCI Vocational Integration Program, which followed the principles of the individual placement and support model of SE for persons with mental illness.Main outcome measures Competitive employment in the community within 2 years.Results For the entire 2-year follow-up period, SE subjects were significantly more likely to achieve employment (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8-41.6) than either the TAU subjects at the intervention sites (10.5%; 95% CI, 5.2-19.7; P<.001) or the TAU subjects at the observational sites (2.3%; 95% CI, 0.0-12.9; P<.002). Most subjects who obtained competitive employment did so in year 1, and the average time to first employment was about 17 weeks.Conclusions SE was better than usual practices in improving employment outcomes for veterans with SCI across a 2-year follow-up period. Although SE continued to be superior to traditional practices over the entire study, the first year of participation in SE may represent a critical window for achieving employment after SCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.012

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottomanelli, L., Barnett, S. D., & Goetz, L. L.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
784-790
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093586685
Cited by
59
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
supported employment, spinal cord injury, veterans, competitive employment, Individual Placement and Support, vocational rehabilitation, usual care, employment effects, time to employment
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Spinal Cord Injuries, Time Factors, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Employment, Supported, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review