Cited by 20Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentFamily and Disability Support ResearchInfant Development and Preterm Care

Early intervention service intensity and change in children’s functional capabilities

Open access
Richardson, Zachary S., Scully, Elizabeth A., Dooling-Litfin, Jodi K., Murphy, Natalie J., Rigau, Briana, Khetani, Mary A., McManus, Beth M.·2020·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To estimate correlates of early intervention (EI) service dosage and gains in children's functional capabilities from EI entry and discharge.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Secondary analyses of a subset of data (N=1005) collected from an EI administrative database on children discharged from a large, urban EI program between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2016.Participants Children who were EI eligible due to developmental delay, had received an EI care plan and at least 1 billable EI service, and had outcomes data at EI entry and exit (N=1005). Measured child characteristics included age (49.0% 12-24mo; n=492), sex (36.0% female; n=362), number of developmental delays (76.1% had 1 developmental delay; n=765), and number of EI services received (78.5% received multiple; n=789).Intervention Not applicable.Main outcome measures Outcomes were EI service intensity (hours per month) and change in functional capabilities as measured via the state-mandated Child Outcomes Summary (COS). Adjusted quantile median regression estimated EI intensity. Adjusted linear regression estimated change in function for social-emotional, cognitive, and adaptive domains of the COS. Measures of children's developmental delay severity, age at EI entry, race and ethnicity, sex, and language.Results Children older than 24 months old experienced significantly higher EI service intensity (b=0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.63). Child age and EI service intensity were significantly linked to gains in social and cognitive COS score changes from EI entry to exit.Conclusions Older children receive a higher intensity of EI services. EI service intensity and age were linked with positive changes in functional gains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.188

Cites

27 of 28 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early identification and intervention for the 1 in 6 children with DDs have been shown to improve outcomes.

    “Early identification and intervention for the 1 in 6 children with DDs have been shown to improve outcomes.79–83”

    From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Results (Change in Activity Competence, page unavailable) link greater early-intervention service intensity with gains in social-emotional and cognitive capabilities among children receiving services. The paper does not establish that early identification improves outcomes or state that 1 in 6 children have developmental disabilities; its reported relationship is an association, not proof of a causal effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]McManus BM, Richardson Z, Scully EA, Dooling-Litfin JK, Graham JE, Khetani MA. (2018). “ Early Intervention Colorado (EI-CO) participant characteristics, service use, and outcomes, Colorado, 2014–2016”. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Inter-university consortium for political and social research 10.3886/ICPSR37131.v1 · DOI
  2. [34]Noyes-Grosser D, Elbaum B. Measuring the impact of early intervention services on children and families: a model approach to family-centered program evaluation and quality improvement. Paper presented at: Third Conference of the International Society on Early Intervention; May 2–5, 2011; New York, NY http://depts.washington.edu/isei/conf_materials/2011_ISEI_Conference_Program.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, Z. S., Scully, E. A., Dooling-Litfin, J. K., Murphy, N. J., Rigau, B., Khetani, M. A., & McManus, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Rocky Mountain Human Services (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Khetani, Mary A.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
815-821
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991193083
Cited by
20
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K12 HD05593, 1R03HD084909-01A1, P2CHD065702)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
early intervention, service intensity, functional outcome, developmental delay, social-emotional development, cognitive development, adaptive behavior, child age, intervention dosage, children with disabilities
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Occupational Therapy, Patient Care Planning, Retrospective Studies, Speech Therapy, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Early Intervention, Educational, Physical Therapy Modalities, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review