Cited by 38Injury Epidemiology and PreventionAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Do Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Influence Preschool Unintentional Injury Risk?

Open access
Garzon, Dawn Lee, Huang, Hongyan, Todd, Richard D.·2008·Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

Abstract

Purpose This study explores the relationship among preschool attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), injury-risk-taking behavior, and unintentional injury.Method An emergency department (ED) casecontrol study of parent-reported child behavior was conducted.Findings Children with ODD and ADHD had significantly more injury-risk-taking behaviors (odds ratio [OR] = 7.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-26.25; OR = 4.87, 95% CI 1.17--20.28, respectively), and injured children had a 17-fold increase in high-risk-taking behaviors (OR 17.2, 95% CI 2.14--138.0). No significant association existed between ODD or ADHD and ED-treated unintentional injury.Implications Disruptive behavior disorders are not major contributors to ED-treated unintentional injury in preschool children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnu.2007.12.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garzon, D. L., Huang, H., & Todd, R. D.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
288-296
ISSN
0883-9417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994417641
Cited by
38
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Psychiatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH017104, T32 MH17104)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, unintentional injuries, preschool children, disruptive behavior disorders, emergency department visits, child behavior
MeSH terms
Accidents, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Hospitals, Teaching, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Socioeconomic Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Midwestern United States, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review