Cited by 270Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentParental Involvement in EducationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Quality child care supports the achievement of low-income children: Direct and indirect pathways through caregiving and the home environment

Open access
McCartney, Kathleen, Dearing, Eric, Taylor, Beck A., Bub, Kristen L.·2007·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Existing studies of child care have not been able to determine whether higher quality child care protects children from the effects of poverty, whether poverty and lower quality child care operate as dual risk factors, or whether both are true. The objective of the current study was to test two pathways through which child care may serve as a naturally occurring intervention for low-income children: a direct pathway through child care quality to child outcomes, and an indirect pathway through improvements in the home environment. Children were observed in their homes and child care settings at 6, 15, 24, and 36 months. An interaction between family income-to-needs ratio and child care quality predicted School Readiness, Receptive Language, and Expressive Language, as well as improvements in the home environment. Children from low-income families profited from observed learning supports in the form of sensitive care and stimulation of cognitive development, and their parents profited from unobserved informal and formal parent supports. Policy implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.06.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children in poverty have less access to higher-quality care outside the home and a lower probability of attending preschools that are emotionally and cognitively supportive of optimal self-regulation.

    “Children in poverty have less access to higher-quality care outside the home and a significantly lower probability of attending preschools that are emotionally and cognitively supportive of optimal self-regulation (McCartney et al. 2007).”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as McCartney et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCartney, K., Dearing, E., Taylor, B. A., & Bub, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • Samford University (US)
Corresponding author
McCartney, Kathleen
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
28
Issue
5-6
Pages
411-426
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105136790
Cited by
270
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
45.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD025451)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child care quality, low-income children, poverty, school readiness, receptive language, expressive language, family environment, caregiving, sensitive caregiving, cognitive stimulation, parental support, early childhood intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review