Cited by 6Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and Development

Intraindividual reaction time variability and academic achievement of primary school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged panel model

Wang, Zhenhong, Sun, Yuan, Wang, Haozhu, Liu, Qianwen, Zhang, Runzhu·2022·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101454

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Q., & Zhang, R.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhenhong
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
82
Pages
101454
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293497086
Cited by
6
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
attentional control, academic performance, elementary school students, bidirectional relationship, Chinese language achievement, mathematics achievement, flanker task, age differences, Chinese children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review