The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food rejections in children: Cognitive and social/environmental factors involved in food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior
Open accessAbstract
Food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior are presented as the two main forms of children's food rejections which are responsible for a reduction of their dietary repertoire. We review the key factors, presented in the literature, that are involved in food rejections during childhood. We first consider a range of "cognitive factors", such as food perception, mental representations, categorization of food items, and emotions and feelings toward food. Next we focus on "social and environmental factors", as these might also significantly influence and modulate children's food rejections. We then summarize the findings to provide a comprehensive view of the factors involved in children's food rejections. Finally, we discuss the need for future studies on food rejections, regarding (i) the distinction between food neophobia and picky/fussy eating, and (ii) the potential link between food categorization abilities and children's food neophobia and pickiness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Food neophobia limits dietary variety in children and adults.”
From Children overcoming picky eating (COPE) - A cluster randomised controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Lafraire, Rioux, Giboreau, & Picard, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Sensation Seeking : Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal
Zuckerman, M. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,706
Murphy, G. L. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001 · Cited by 2,650
Sensation seeking. Beyond the optimal level of arousal
Eysenck, H. J. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90044-6 · Cited by 2,296
Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents.
Birch, L. L., & Fisher, J. O. (1998) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.101.s2.539 · Cited by 2,282
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
Development of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
Wardle, J., Guthrie, C. A., Sanderson, S., & Rapoport, L. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00792 · Cited by 1,747
Birch, L. L., Fisher, J. O., Grimm-Thomas, K., Markey, C. N., Sawyer, R., & Johnson, S. L. (2001) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.2001.0398 · Cited by 1,654
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ares, G., De Rosso, S., Mueller, C., Philippe, K., Pickard, A., Nicklaus, S., van Kleef, E., & Varela, P. (2024) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuad072 · Cited by 173
Cole, N. C., An, R., Lee, S., & Donovan, S. M. (2017) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nux024 · Cited by 166
A review of instruments developed to measure food neophobia
Damsbo-Svendsen, M., Frøst, M. B., & Olsen, A. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.032 · Cited by 145
Childhood fussy/picky eating behaviours: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies
Wolstenholme, H., Kelly, C. N. M., Hennessy, M., & Heary, C. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0899-x · Cited by 146
Food fussiness and food neophobia share a common etiology in early childhood
Smith, A. D., Herle, M., Fildes, A., Cooke, L. J., Steinsbekk, S., & Llewellyn, C. H. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12647 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Lafraire, J., Rioux, C., Giboreau, A., & Picard, D.
- Affiliations
- Institut Paul Bocuse (FR)
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lafraire, Jérémie
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 234
- Pages
- 347-357
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1773621283
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- food neophobia, picky eating, food perception, food categorization
- MeSH terms
- Child, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
