Cited by 1,747Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Development of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

Open access
Wardle, Jane, Guthrie, Carol Ann, Sanderson, Saskia, Rapoport, Lorna·2001·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Individual differences in several aspects of eating style have been implicated in the development of weight problems in children and adults, but there are presently no reliable and valid scales that assess a range of dimensions of eating style. This paper describes the development and preliminary validation of a parent‐rated instrument to assess eight dimensions of eating style in children; the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ). Constructs for inclusion were derived both from the existing literature on eating behaviour in children and adults, and from interviews with parents. They included reponsiveness to food, enjoyment of food, satiety responsiveness, slowness in eating, fussiness, emotional overeating, emotional undereating, and desire for drinks. A large pool of items covering each of these constructs was developed. The number of items was then successively culled through analysis of responses from three samples of families of young children ( N = 131; N = 187; N = 218), to produce a 35‐item instrument with eight scales which were internally valid and had good test‐retest reliability. Investigation of variations by gender and age revealed only minimal gender differences in any aspect of eating style. Satiety responsiveness and slowness in eating diminished from age 3 to 8. Enjoyment of food and food responsiveness increased over this age range. The CEBQ should provide a useful measure of eating style for research into the early precursors of obesity or eating disorders. This is especially important in relation to the growing evidence for the heritability of obesity, where good measurement of the associated behavioural phenotype will be crucial in investigating the contribution of inherited variations in eating behaviour to the process of weight gain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-7610.00792

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Constant factors such as appetitive traits, genetic makeup, usual food preferences, and weight status are associated with different levels of reactivity to food cues.

    “Constant factors such as certain appetitive traits (e.g., those assessed by the Adult and Children Eating Behavior Questionnaires) [42,43], a person’s genetic makeup, usual food preferences, and weight status are all associated with different levels of reactivity to food cues [44,45,46,47,48,49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). In T. M. Achen- bach (Ed.), Manual for Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behaviour Profile. Burlington, VT : University of Vermont.
  2. Herman, C. P., & Mack, D. (1975). Restrained and unrestrained eating. Journal of Personality, 43, 647-660.
  3. Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295-315.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wardle, J., Guthrie, C. A., Sanderson, S., & Rapoport, L.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
963-970
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2133775078
Cited by
1,747
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 47
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, eating behaviour, eating styles, children, food responsiveness, satiety responsiveness, food enjoyment, emotional overeating, emotional undereating, eating disorders, heritability of obesity, age differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Constitution, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Parents, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review