Cited by 13Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorCardiovascular and exercise physiology

An acute bout of swimming increases post-exercise energy intake in young healthy men and women

Open access
Thackray, Alice E., Willis, Scott A., Sherry, Aron P., Clayton, David J., Broom, David R., Demashkieh, Mayada, Sargeant, Jack A., James, Lewis J. +3 more·2020·Appetite

Abstract

Single bouts of land-based exercise (for example, walking, running, cycling) do not typically alter post-exercise energy intake on the day of exercise. However, anecdotal and preliminary empirical evidence suggests that swimming may increase appetite and energy intake. This study compared the acute effects of swimming on appetite, energy intake, and food preference and reward, versus exertion-matched cycling and a resting control. Thirty-two men (n = 17; mean ± SD age 24 ± 2 years, body mass index [BMI] 25.0 ± 2.6 kg/m 2 ) and women (n = 15; age 22 ± 3 years, BMI 22.8 ± 2.3 kg/m 2 ) completed three experimental trials (swimming, cycling, control) in a randomised, crossover design. The exercise trials involved 60-min of 'hard' exercise (self-selected rating of perceived exertion: 15) performed 90-min after a standardised breakfast. Food preference and reward were assessed via the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire 15-min after exercise, whilst ad libitum energy intake was determined 30-min after exercise. The control trial involved identical procedures except no exercise was performed. Compared with control (3259 ± 1265 kJ), swimming increased ad libitum energy intake (3857 ± 1611 kJ; ES = 0.47, 95% CI of the mean difference between trials 185, 1010 kJ, P = 0.005); the magnitude of increase was smaller after cycling (3652 ± 1619 kJ; ES = 0.31, 95% CI -21, 805 kJ, P = 0.062). Ad libitum energy intake was similar between swimming and cycling (ES = 0.16, 95% CI -207, 618 kJ, P =…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104785

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thackray, A. E., Willis, S. A., Sherry, A. P., Clayton, D. J., Broom, D. R., Demashkieh, M., Sargeant, J. A., James, L. J., Finlayson, G., Stensel, D. J., & King, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
King, James A.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
154
Pages
104785
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035896849
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • NIHR
  • Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
swimming, food preferences, food reward, cycling, water immersion, water temperature, sex differences, ad libitum energy intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Appetite, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Swimming, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult, Breakfast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review