Effects of positive interaction with caretakers on the behaviour of socially housed common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common marmosets showed increased grooming and playful activities following periods of additional positive interactions with their caretakers.
“Similarly, common marmosets showed increased grooming and playful activities following periods of additional positive interactions with their caretakers [28].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Similarly, common marmosets showed increased grooming and playful activities following periods of additional positive interactions with their caretakers [28].”
BackgroundIndividual differences in temperament and behavioral management practices for nonhuman primates
Coleman, K. (2012) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.002 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2015) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21182 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Manciocco, A., Chiarotti, F., & Vitale, A.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Manciocco, Arianna
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 100-107
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076787633
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- Callithrix jacchus, human-primate interactions, positive reinforcement, captive primates, animal welfare, environmental enrichment, grooming, play behavior, locomotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
