Cited by 94Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Individual differences in temperament and behavioral management practices for nonhuman primates

Open access
Coleman, Kristine·2012·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

Effective behavioral management plans are tailored to unique behavioral patterns of each individual species. However, even within a species behavioral needs of individuals can vary. Factors such as age, sex, and temperament can affect behavioral needs of individuals. While some of these factors, such as age and sex, are taken into account, other factors, such as an individual's temperament, are rarely specifically provided for in behavioral management plans. However, temperament may affect how animals respond to socialization, positive reinforcement training and other forms of enrichment. This review will examine how individual differences in temperament might affect, or be affected by, behavioral management practices for captive primates. Measuring temperament may help us predict outcome of social introductions. It can also predict which animals may be difficult to train using traditional methods. Further, knowledge of temperament may be able to help identify individuals at risk for development of behavioral problems. Taken together, understanding individual differences in temperament of captive primates can help guide behavioral management decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.002

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research across various zoo species has demonstrated that animals exhibit diverse behavioral traits that influence their responses to management practices.

    “Research across various zoo species has demonstrated that animals exhibit diverse behavioral traits that influence their responses to management practices [62,63].”

    From Socializing a group of male Asian elephants in a semi-captive facility in Lao PDR (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe individual differences in captive primates and explain that temperament may affect responses to socialization, training, and enrichment. The paper does not establish this across various zoo species, and its Discussion emphasizes that few studies have examined the relationship, making “has demonstrated” stronger than the source warrants. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Buss AH 1987 Personality: Primate heritage and human distinctiveness Aronoff J Rabin A Emergence of Personality Springer Publishing Co. New York, NY 57 101
  2. Capitanio JP 1999 Personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques: prediction of behaviors across time and situation Am J Primatol 47 299 320 10206208
  3. Crockett CM 1990 Psychological well-being and enrichment workshop held at Primate Centers’ Directors’ meeting Lab Primate News 29 3 6
  4. Miller CL Bard KA Juno CJ Nadler RD 1986 Behavioral responiveness of young chimpanzees to a novel environment Folia Primatol (Basel) 47 128 142 3583150
  5. Reichard T Shellabargar W Laule G 1992 Training for husbandry and medical purposes Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums AAZPA Wheeling, WV 396 402
  6. Schapiro SJ Bloomsmith MA Suarez SA Porter LM 1996 Effects of social and inanimate enrichment on the behavior of yearling rhesus monkeys Am J Primatol 40 247 260 31918516
  7. Schino G Perretta G Taglioni AM Monaco V Troisi A 1996 Primate displacement activities as an ethopharmacological model of anxiety Anxiety 2 186 191 9160621

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, K.
Affiliations
Oregon National Primate Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Coleman, Kristine
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
137
Issue
3-4
Pages
106-113
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114158229
Cited by
94
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000163, K01RR000163)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
individual differences, temperament, non-human primates, captive primates, behavior management, socialization, positive reinforcement training, enrichment, behavioral problems, age and sex effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review