Cited by 200Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Factors associated with aggressive responses in pet dogs

Hsu, Yuying, Sun, Liching·2010·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.013

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, Y., & Sun, L.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Yuying
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
123
Issue
3-4
Pages
108-123
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121339991
Cited by
200
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
canine aggression, canine temperament, C-BARQ, factor structure, corporal punishment, breed, living environment, social fear, trainability, pain sensitivity, Chinese translation, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review