Cited by 105Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Salivary cortisol concentrations and behavior in a population of healthy dogs hospitalized for elective procedures

Open access
Hekman, Jessica P., Karas, Alicia Z., Dreschel, Nancy A.·2012·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

Identification of severe stress in hospitalized veterinary patients may improve treatment outcomes and welfare. To assess stress levels, in Study 1, we collected salivary cortisol samples and behavioral parameters in 28 healthy dogs hospitalized prior to elective procedures. Dogs were categorized into two groups; low cortisol (LC) and high cortisol (HC), based on the distribution of cortisol concentrations (< or ≥ 0.6 µg/dL). We constructed a stress research tool (SRT) based on three behaviors, (head resting, panting and lip licking) that were most strongly related to salivary cortisol concentrations. In Study 2, we collected salivary cortisol samples from 39 additional dogs, evaluated behavior/cortisol relationships, assigned each dog to an LC or HC group, and tested the ability of the SRT to predict salivary cortisol. Median (interquartile range) salivary cortisol concentrations were not different between Study 1 (0.43 µg/dL, 0.33 to 1.00 µg/dL) and Study 2 dogs (0.41 µg/dL, 0.28 to 0.52 µg/dL). The median salivary cortisol concentration was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.001) in LC versus HC dogs in each study; (Study 1 LC: 0.38 µg/dL, (0.19 to 0.44), n = 19, HC: 2.0 µg/dL, (1.0 to 2.8), n = 9, and Study 2 LC: 0.35 µg/dL, (0.25 to 0.48), n = 28, HC: 0.89 µg/dL, (0.66 to 1.4), n = 7). In Study 1, three behaviors were found to be associated with salivary cortisol concentrations. Duration of head resting was negatively associated with salivary cortisol (ρ = -0.60, P = 0.001), panting and lip licking were positively associated with cortisol (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.04, and 0.30, P = 0.05, respectively), Head resting (p = 0.001) and panting (p = 0.003) were also associated with LC/HC group assignment. In Study 2 dogs, the three behaviors correlated (but not significantly) with salivary cortisol concentration; of the three, only head resting was significantly associated with LC/HC group assignment (P = 0.03). The SRT derived from Study 1 was effective at prediction of salivary cortisol concentrations when applied to 20 min but not 2 min of behavioral data from Study 2. Additionally, we note that dexmedetomidine and butorphanol sedation more than 6 h prior to measurement was found to be significantly (P = 0.05) associated with lower salivary cortisol concentrations when compared to unsedated dogs. Our work offers support for eventual construction of a rating tool that utilizes the presence or absence of specific behaviors to identify higher salivary cortisol concentrations in dogs subjected to hospitalization, which may be tied to greater psychogenic stress levels. Future work to investigate the effects of stress on dogs and its mitigation in clinical situations may be approached by studying a combination o f parameters, and should consider the possible beneficial effects of sedatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.007

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Panting has been correlated with increased salivary cortisol concentrations, representative of increased sympatho-medullary-adrenal axis activity, in the hospital setting.

    “Panting has been correlated with increased salivary cortisol concentrations, representative of increased sympatho-medullary-adrenal axis activity, in the hospital setting.9”

    From Evaluation of the effects of hospital visit stress on physiologic variables in dogs (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results (section 3.1; page not provided) report a positive correlation between panting and salivary cortisol in hospitalized dogs (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.04). The Introduction discusses cortisol in relation to stress-axis measures but does not establish that the observed cortisol increase represents increased sympatho-medullary-adrenal (SAM) axis activity. The panting correlation was also not statistically significant in Study 2 (Results, section 3.2). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The results most likely stemmed from activation of the sympathetic nervous system.

    “These results most likely stemmed from the activation of the sympathetic nervous system and should be taken into account when assessing patients in the veterinary hospital setting.4,8,9”

    From Evaluation of the effects of hospital visit stress on physiologic variables in dogs (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction mentions the sympatho-medullary-adrenal axis as one way to evaluate stress, while the Discussion relates the study’s findings to salivary cortisol and behavior. Neither section attributes the reported results to activation of the sympathetic nervous system; searches for that mechanism found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hekman, J. P., Karas, A. Z., & Dreschel, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Karas, Alicia Z.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
141
Issue
3-4
Pages
149-157
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078701740
Cited by
105
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • U.S. Army
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 RR018267)
  • Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
salivary cortisol, canine stress, hospitalized dogs, elective procedures, panting, lip licking, stress biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review