Cited by 100Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Adopter-dog interactions at the shelter: behavioral and contextual predictors of adoption

Protopopova, Alexandra, Wynne, Clive David Lawrence·2014·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Protopopova, A., & Wynne, C. D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Protopopova, Alexandra
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
157
Pages
109-116
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074194662
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
shelter dogs, dog adoption, dog behavior, adoption intention, dog morphology, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review