A multi-enclosure study investigating the behavioural response of meerkats to zoo visitors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies conducted in immersive zoos with naturalistic exhibits found that the number of visitors had no impact on the welfare of captive animals.
“Other studies conducted in immersive zoos with naturalistic exhibits (Choo et al., 2011;Sherwen et al., 2014) showed similar results, demonstrating that the number of visitors had no impact on the welfare of captive animals.”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Sherwen et al., 2014
Studies that have investigated animal responses to visitors in immersive zoos all report minor effects of the presence of visitors on animal behaviour.
“Despite the limited number of studies that have investigated animal responses to visitors in immersive zoos, they all report minor effects of the presence of visitors on animal behaviour (Sherwen et al., 2014).”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Sherwen et al., 2014
Sherwen et al. [27] found no effect of signs on visitor numbers.
“In contrast, Sherwen, Magrath, Butler, Phillips and Hemsworth [27] found no effect of signs on visitor numbers.”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [27]
Other studies have found that signs can effectively regulate visitor behaviour.
“In comparison, other studies have found that signs can effectively regulate visitor behaviour [27,34].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [27]
The literature on the effects of visitor interactions on zoo animals is ambiguous, with studies providing evidence for negative, neutral and positive impacts.
“However, the literature on the effects of visitor interactions on zoo animals is somewhat ambiguous, with studies providing evidence for a range of impacts interpreted as negative [12,13], neutral [14,15] and positive [16].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [14]
Visitors can have negative, neutral or positive impacts on zoo animal behaviour and welfare.
“Decades of research on the visitor effect in zoos has demonstrated that visitors can have negative, neutral or positive impacts on zoo animal behaviour and welfare.”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [14]
A study on meerkats found no difference in meerkat behaviour at any site in response to the experimental reduction in intensity of visitor behaviour.
“a study on meerkats investigated the effect of reducing the intensity of visitor behaviour (e.g., noise levels and attempted interaction) on several groups of meerkats and found no difference in meerkat behaviour at any site in response to the experimental reduction in intensity of visitor behaviour [14].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Sherwen, S. L., Magrath, M. J. L., Butler, K. L., Phillips, C. J. C., & Hemsworth, P. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Zoos Victoria (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sherwen, Sally L.
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 70-77
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995623980
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- MeerKAT, Suricata suricatta, visitor regulation, captive animal welfare, animal behavior, sustained attention, zoo enclosures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review